Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLP/4770/2022 of SAJJA SRINIVASA RAO Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 28 September 2026

Cites 4, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4770/2022 Between: 1. SAJJA SRINIVASA RAO, , A.R.H.C. 1380 S/O VENKATA SWAMY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60

APHC010321602022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4770/2022

Between:

1. SAJJA SRINIVASA RAO, , A.R.H.C. 1380 S/O VENKATA SWAMY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O D.NO.74-14-65, T.F.-4, FRIENDS RESIDENCY, MEGA TOWNSHIP, NEW R T C COLONY, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

AND

1. THE

STATE

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

REP.

BY

SHO,

SURYARAOPET POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA CITY, THROUGH

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI.

2. MALLA BALA NAGA MURALI KRISHNA, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, WORKING AS A R P C 2579, C S W

VIJAYAWADA, R/O T-4, E.BLOCK, VYAS COMPLEX POLICE

QUARTERS, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):

Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS

praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtto call for the records in the impugned

C.C.No.560/2022 on the file of 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Vijayawada, N.T.R. District and quash the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the

High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.560/2022

on the file of 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Vijayawada, N.T.R. District including the appearance of the Petitioner/Accused pending disposal of the above criminal petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to reopen the criminal petition, i.e. CRLP

No. 4770 of 2022 and pass s

IA NO: 2 OF 2025

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to recall the order under proceeding sheet dt.30-01-2025 and pass.

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant permission to me to compound the offences taken cognizance under Sections 353 & 506 IPC in Crime No.22/2022 on the file of Suryaraopet Police Station, Vijayawada City in

C.C.No.560/2022

on

the

file

of

Hon'ble

I

Additional

Metropolitan

Magistratecum-1 Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to allow this CrI.P.No.4770/2022

by quashing the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.560/2022 on the file of Hon'ble I Additional Metropolitan Magistrate cum-I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

2. SAI SARAN CHODISETTY

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2026

In/and

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4770 OF 2022

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

4

Decisions referred to

In this index

2

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Petitioner as well as respondent No.2 filed two petitions in I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2026 seeking permission to compound the offences under Sections 353 and 506 of Indian Penal Code.

2. As per the version of petitioner as well as respondent No.2, they settled the disputes out of court as they have been working together in police department at Vijayawada and they have also filed joint compromise memo which shows that to maintain cordial relationship, they both settled the matter.

3. Heard the leaned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.2 and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.

4. Petitioner as well as respondent No.2 are present. Heard them personally. Compared their names and details.

5. Recorded the submissions of both the petitioner as well as respondent No.2. Joint compromise memo shall form part of the record. It is needless to say that in view of the amicable settlement arrived at by both the parties, this court can give permission to both the parties to compound the matter as per the judgment of Apex Court in Jagdish Channa & others Vs. State of Haryana & another1, Shiji Vs. Radhika & Another2, Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab3 and Anita Maria Dias and Another vs. State 1 AIR 2008 SC 1968 2 (2011) 10 SCC 705 3 (2014) 6 SCC 466

of Maharashtra and Anr4, even in non- compoundable cases, on the basis of compromise, criminal proceedings can be quashed to save the valuable time of the Court. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 are allowed.

6. In the result, and in view of the settlement between both the parties, this Criminal Petition No.4770 of 2022 is allowed quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.560 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada against the petitioner/accused of the offences under Sections 353 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J 29.09.2026 Vns

4 (2018) 3 SCC 290

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead