Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3562/2026 of Garuda Subbaiah Das Vs B V Nageswara Reddy on 27 September 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3562/2026 Between: 1. GARUDA SUBBAIAH DAS, S/O G K SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 65

::1::

APHC010506412026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3562/2026

Between:

1. GARUDA SUBBAIAH DAS, S/O G K SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT

YEARS,RIO H.NO. 14-125, SC COLONY,KONDAPET, BHANUMUKKALA VILLAGE,BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. B V NAGESWARA REDDY, S/o Not known to the petitioner,Tahsildar, Banaganapalli Mandal,Nandyal district. 518124

...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the Respondent herein in changing the nature of classification of the property in Sy.No.94 of Bhanumukkala Village, Baganapally mandal, Nandyala district on 2-6-2026 is in violation of the Interim Orders dt. 12.08.2025 Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. ::2::

The Court made the following ORDER:

1. This Court, vide order dated 12.08.2025, suspended the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, dated 20.06.2025, pending disposal of the writ petition.

2. The petitioner had earlier made a representation to the Revenue Divisional Officer through a grievance dated 03.03.2024, requesting the authorities to grant Ac.0.26 cents of land to the petitioner. The Revenue Divisional Officer, vide proceedings dated 20.06.2025, intimated the petitioner that the request for grant of Ac.0.26 cents of land was not maintainable, as the said land is a Rasta.

3. However, this Court suspended the said proceedings. Therefore, the present Contempt Case has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 12.08.2025. However, there is no positive direction in favour of the petitioner under the said order.

4. Therefore, the Contempt Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

28.09.2026 RMD

::3::

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3562/2026

28.09.2026 RMD

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead