Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2582/2026 of Mallela Goutham Reddy Vs Mallela Raja Ram Reddy on 27 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2582 of 2026 Between: 1. MALLELA GOUTHAM REDDY, S/O MURALIDHAR,AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,RIO
APHC010481412026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2582 of 2026
Between:
1. MALLELA
GOUTHAM
REDDY,
S/O
MURALIDHAR,AGED
ABOUT 28 YEARS,RIO D.NO.3/75,RAYAVARAM LINGAPURAM, PRODDATUR
MANDAL,Y.S.R.
KADAPA
DISTRICT-
516362.PRESENTLY RIO TOWER 6B, FLAT NO.1800,LODHA
BELLAZA,
EAST
BLOCK,KUKATPALLY,
K.P.H.B.
COLONY,HYDERABAD
...PETITIONER
AND
1. MALLELA RAJA RAM REDDY, S/O LATE VENKATA RAMANA
REDDY,AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BUSINESS,RIO D.NO.3/75- A,RAYAVARAM, LINGAPURAM,KOTHAPALLE PANCHAYAT, PRODDATUR MANDAL,Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT- 516362.
2. MALLELA MURALIDHAR, S/O LATE VENKATA RAMANA
REDDY,AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, BUSINESS,RIO TOWER 6B, FLAT NO.1800,LODHA BELLAZA, EAST BLOCK,KUKATPALLY, K.P.H.B. COLONY,HYDERABAD- 500085, TELANGANA STATE.
3. MALLELA LAKSHMI KANTHAMMA, W/O LATE VENKATA
RAMANA
REDDY,L
J
AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
HOUSEWIFE,RIO
D.NO.3/75,RAYAVARAM,
LINGAPURAM,KOTHAPALLE
PANCHAYAT,
PRODDATUR
MANDAL,Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT- 516362.
4. BODIREDDY
GARI
KAVITHA,
W/O
NARESH
KUMAR
REDDY,D/O LATE M. VENKATA RAMANA REDDY,AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
HOUSEWIFE,RIO
D.NO.3-56-1,
GREENLAND
ESTATE,KONDAMARRIAPALLI
THATTIVARIPALLI,AROGYAVARAM
POST,
MADANAPALLE
MANDAL,CHITTOOR DISTRICT- 517326.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Page 1 of 3
Aggrieved by the order dt.12-08-2026 passed in I.A.No.292/202 6
in O.S.No.16/2026 on the file of Honble VIII Additional District Judge, Proddatur, the 3rd Party/Implead Petitioner filed the present Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India on the following grounds and others that would be urged at the time of finalhearing0pass such other order or orders as the Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case in the interests of justice and equity.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V NITESH
The Court made the following:
Page 2 of 3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2582 of 2026
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the present Civil Revision Petition and the same is also endorsed on the bundle. Permission is accorded and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Office is directed to return the certified/original papers to the petitioner forthwith. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 28.09.2026
siva
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2582 of 2026
Date: 28.09.2026
siva
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…