Andhra Pradesh High Court

MACMA/1303/2011 of VASANTHA & 5 ORS Vs M.SUNDARAM & ANR on 27 September 2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1303/2011 Between: 1. VASANTHA & 5 ORS, W/O LATE CHINNARAJULU R/O

APHC010287882011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1303/2011

Between:

1. VASANTHA & 5 ORS, W/O LATE CHINNARAJULU R/O CHITTAPARA

VILLAGE AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

2. MANJULA, D/O LATE CHINNARAJULU R/O CHITTAPARA VILLAGE

AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3. JAYANTHI, D/O LATE CHINNARAJULU R/O CHITTAPARA VILLAGE

AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. LATHA, D/O LATE CHINNARAJULU R/O CHITTAPARA VILLAGE AND

POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

5. VALARAMATHI,

D/O

LATE

CHINNARAJULU

MINOR,

R/O

CHITTAPARA VILLAGE AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR

DISTRICT.

6. JAYAMALI, D/O LATE CHINNARAJULU MINOR, APPE. 5 AND 6 ARE

REP.BY THEIR MOTHER SMT. VASANTHA R/O CHITTAPARA

VILLAGE AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...APPELLANT(S)

AND

1. M SUNDARAM ANR, S/O NOT KNOWN R/O 20-30-7, HASSAN

KHANA STREET, CHITTOOR.

2. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REP.BY ITS

BRANCH MANAGER, VELLORE BRANCH, JAMBU BALA COMPLEX,

- 29/B, ARCOT ROAD,

Page 1 of 3

...RESPONDENT(S):

Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High CourtBeing aggrieved by the award and decree dated 17.08.1999 in M.V.O.P. No. 391 of 1994 on the file of the First Additional District Judge cum-Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chittoor, insofar as the Hon'ble Tribunal had not awarded in full the sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- claimed by the appellants herein, the appellants present this Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal to this Hon'ble Court for the following, among other grounds IA NO: 1 OF 2003(CMP 9700 OF 2003

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 1248 days in filing the above CMA

Counsel for the Appellant(S):

1. G MANOHAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA

Page 2 of 3

MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1303 OF 2011

JUDGEMENT:

[

Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal for non prosecution” today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The proceeding sheet dated 25.09.2026 would also show that there was no representation on behalf of the appellants.

2. Sri N.Rama Krishna, learned Standing Counsel representing the respondent No.2/Insurance Company is in attendance.

3. In that view of the matter, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 28.09.2026 UPS

MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1303 OF 2011 Dt.28.09.2026

UPS

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead