Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/26723/2026 of M/s. Sitaram Energy And Logistics Limited, Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) on 27 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

TCDS,J W.P.No. 26723 of 2026 Dated 28.09.2026 APHC010490172026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3543] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION

APHC010490172026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. M/S. SITARAM ENERGY AND LOGISTICS LIMITED,, REPRESENTED

BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. MANISH MALL

HAVING ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT 81-10-17, 496, YARA KAVERI, J N ROAD, NEAR WATER TANK, VENKATESWARA

NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI, ANDHRA PRADESH, 533106

...PETITIONER

AND

1. ASSISTANT

COMMISSIONER

ST,

,

ARYAPURAM

CIRCLE,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

2ND

FLOOR,

JETTY

TOWERS,

DANAVEIPATA,

RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM,

EAST

GODAVARI

DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-533103

2. OIL AND GAS CORPORATION LIMITED, ONGC, TRIPURA ASSET, ONGC, BADHARGHAT, ONGC AGARTALA, WEST TRIPURA-799014

...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. AVANIJA INUGANTI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. Mr. Lalithendra Gulani, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through virtual mode and submitted that, subsequent to filing of the present Writ Petition, returns for the relevant tax period were filed and after verification of the same, communication impugned in the Writ Petition was withdrawn.

2. Mr. R.Kalyana Chakravarthy, learned Government Pleader for Commercial tax, is present and not disputed the submission made.

3. In the light of the statement made by learned counsel for petitioner, nothing survives for further adjudication in the present Writ petition.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs.

Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Dated 25.09.2026 KS

Whether the order is : Speaking: Yes Reasoned : Yes Reportable: No Non-Reportable: Yes

Dated:28.09.2026.

KS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead