Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1110/2024 of T SUREKHA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 27 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 1110/2024 Between: 1. T SUREKHA, D/O.T.DORASWAMY AGED 40 YEARS, OCC S.G.TEACHER LMC PRIMARY SCHOOL, KADAPA
APHC010016602024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1110/2024
Between:
1. T SUREKHA, D/O.T.DORASWAMY AGED 40 YEARS, OCC
S.G.TEACHER LMC PRIMARY SCHOOL, KADAPA TOWN YSR
KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. G.EPSIBA, D/O.YESUDAS AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC SG
TEACHER LMC PRIMARY SCHOOL, KADAPA TOWN YSR KADAPA
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
SCHOOL
EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT
A.P.SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI
GUNTUR
DISTRICT, AP
2. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA, AP
4. THE LMC PRIMARY SCHOOL AIDED, CSI COMPOUND, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS HEAD
MASTER
5. THE CHURCH OF SOUTH INDIA, CSI COMPOUND, KADAPA - 516
001 YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH REP.BY ITS
BISHOP RESPONDENTS
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, in not considering the claim of the petitioners for absorption against Aided vacancies though the petitioners are discharging their duties as S.G.Assistants against Aided post with effect from 2007 and 2002 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and in violation of Art. 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to absorb the petitioners against working Aided Vacancies without any further delay with all consequential benefits and pass.
IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to absorb the petitioners against working Aided Vacancies by considering their lengthy service by passing an appropriate orders on the representation dt.07-11-2023 filed by the petitioners and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. GUTTAPALEM VIJAYA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, in not considering the claim of the petitioners for absorption against Aided vacancies though the petitioners are discharging their duties as S.G. Assistants against Aided post with effect from 2007 and 2002 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and in violation of Art. 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to absorb the petitioners against working Aided Vacancies without any further delay with all consequential benefits and pass…”
2. Subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the respondents passed speaking orders rejecting the claim of the petitioners vide proceedings Rc.No.536416/B3/2023-1, dated 01.02.2024 and Rc.No.536416/B3/2023-2, dated 01.02.2024, rejecting the claim of the respective petitioners.
3. Though the said orders are placed on record along with the counter- affidavit, the petitioners have not challenged the same.
4. Heard.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners sought leave to challenge the said orders, as the orders have been passed by the respondents subsequent to filing of the writ petition. Considering the subsequent orders dated 01.02.2024 passed by the respondents, nothing further survives for consideration in the present writ petition.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the orders dated 01.02.2024 passed by the respondents vide the aforesaid proceedings, in accordance with law.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date.28.09.2026 SR