Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2849/2026 of Gubbala Ramanamma Vs Sri Ketan Garg on 24 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 25th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2849/2026 Between: 1. GUBBALA RAMANAMMA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, W/O. LATE GUBBALA APPANNA, D.NO. 19-179, RAMAKRISHNA
APHC010393402026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 25th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2849/2026
Between:
1. GUBBALA RAMANAMMA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, W/O. LATE
GUBBALA APPANNA, D.NO. 19-179, RAMAKRISHNA PURAM NEAR
NEW CENTRAL JAIL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH- 530040.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI KETAN GARG, THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM-
531173.
2. HANUMANTHU SANKARA RAO, THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, PENDURTHI ZONE, GVMC, VISAKHAPTANM DISTRICT- 531173.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court order dated 09.09.2025 in WP.No. 23813 of 2025
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.2802 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in pursuance of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.23813 of 2025, dated 09.09.2025, the respondent authorities have complied with the said order and, as such, no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 25.09.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.2849 of 2026 Date: 25.09.2026
KGM