Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/24144/2025 of SIRAM JASWANTH Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 24 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE 25th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 24144/2025 Between: 1. SIRAM JASWANTH, S/O. CHANDRA MOHAN RAO, MALE, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O. 76-8/1-42,
APHC010469952025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 25th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 24144/2025
Between:
1. SIRAM JASWANTH, S/O. CHANDRA MOHAN RAO, MALE, AGED
ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O. 76-8/1-42, LALITHA NAGAR, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA-520012.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT
BHAVAN, 1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI - 110001.
2. THE
NATIONAL
HIGHWAYS
AUTHORITY
OF
INDIA
NHAI,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, G-5 AND 6, SECTOR-10, DWARKA, NEW DELHI -110075.
3. REGIONAL OFFICER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
NEAR VARADI, VIJAYAWADA.
4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF
INDIA (NHAI), AMARAVATHI PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, VASANTHA
RESIDENCY,
LAKSHMI
NARASIMHA
COLONY,
MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH-522503.
5. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF
INDIA (NHAI), VIJAYAWADA PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, VANAMALI BUILDINGS, GURU NANAK COLONY, VIJAYAWADA-
520008.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in not allowing the high court advocates, court staff, to reach AP High Court at Nelapadu on the completed newly six-lane Vijayawada bypass road from Gollapudi(Km.30 plus 000) to Chinnakakani (Km.47plus 881) including Major Bridge across river Krishna of NH-16 under Bharatmala Pariyojana Project (not allowing advocates and court staff, advocate clerks, at gollapudi side and to get down at Venkatayapalem vice versa) as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (d) and 21 of the Constitution of India and directing the Respondents, particularly Respondent No. 2 to 4, to immediately and forthwith allow the advocates, advocate clerks, court staff, to use along with two wheelers new six- lane Vijayawada bypass road from Goliapudi(Km.30
plus 000) to Chinnakakani (Km.47plus 881) including Major Bridge across river Krishna of NH-16 under Bharatmala Pariyojana, connecting Gollapudi to Venkatayapalem section, which forms part of the Western Bypass, for public use and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to 4 to allow the advocates, and advocate clerks and court staff to use the newly constructed bridge across the River Krishna connecting Gollapudi to Venkatayapalem section along with two wheelers, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M UMA DEVI (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)
2. THANDAVA YOGESH
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 25.09.2026. JLV
Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 24144/2025
Date:25.09.2026 JLV