Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/31844/2025 of RAYAPUDI RAJASEKHAR Vs THE CUSTOMS EXCISE AND SERVICES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL on 23 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 24 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 31844 OF 2025 Between: 1. RAYAPUDI RAJASEKHAR, S/o. Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Aged about 53 years, Occ Managing
APHC010616612025
IN THE
THURSDAY, T
THE HONOURA
THE HONOURABL
WRIT P
Between:
1. RAYAPUDI RAJASEKHA
years, Occ Managing Par
D.No. 13/50, Addala Bazaa
2. Vemula Venkata Rama
years, Occ-Clerk D.No.
Jaggaiahpeta, NTR District,
3. Nomula Pavan Kumar,,
Clerk D.No. 3-184, Rama
521175
1. THE CUSTOMS EXCIS
Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Te
2. The Commissioner of Ce
Hero Honda Show Room, G
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THE 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
LE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDE
PETITION NO: 31844 OF 2025
AR, S/o. Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Age
rtner M/s Rayapudi Lakshmi Narasim
ar, Jaggaiahpeta NTR District, A. P.-521
Krishna,, S/o. Venkata Balarama Age
112-93, Akashpuri Vari Street, Kri
, A.P. -521175
S/o. N. Gurunadham Aged about32 y
alayam Bazaar, Jaggaiahpeta, NTR Di
...P
AND
E AND SERVICES TAX APPELLATE T
elangana.,500004.
entral Tax andCustoms Appeals, Ring Ro
Guntur District, A.P., 522007.
H
D
ELA
ed about 53
mha Bullion
ed about44
shna Gudi
years, Occ-
strict, A.P.-
Petitioners
TRIBUNAL,
oad, Opp to
3. TheCommissioner of Customs Preventive, 57-17-03, c-14, 2nd Floor, Industrial Estate, Autonagar Stalin Corporate Building, Vijayawada, NTR
District-52000
4. The Additional Commissioner of Customs Preventive, 57-17-03, c-14, 2nd Floor, Industrial Estate, Autonagar Stalin Corporate Building, Vijayawada, NTR District-520007
5. The Addl Director general, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Hyderabad Zonal Unit,H.No.10-02-289/57/1 and57/2, Suryavanshi Residency, Third Cross Road, Shanti Nagar Colony, Masab Tank, Hyderabad, Telangana.,
500028.
6. The Deputy Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Regional Office, M.G. Road Vijayawada, NTR District, A.P.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the Respondent No. 6 in not returning the surety/security amount of Rs. 11,30,000/- along with interest to the petitioner No.1 in view of the order final order A/30259- 30261/2024 dated 08.04.2024 in 30203/2023, 30204/2023 and 30207/2023
passed by the Respondent No.1 as arbitrary, irregular, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No. 6 to payback the surety amount of Rs. 11,30,000/- along with interest to the petitioner No.1
forthwith and pass
Counsel for the Petitioners: K V ADITYA CHOWDARY
Counsel for the Respondents: SANTHI CHANDRA (Sr. Standing Counsel for CBIC) Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
Smt. Santhi Chandra, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.3
and 4, on instructions, would submit that in compliance of the order dated 06.1.2026 passed by this Court, the Superintendent of Customs (Preventive), Customs Preventive Commissionerate, Vijayawada, filed a petition under Section 360 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), praying the Court to permit the complainant to withdraw the complaint in
C.C.No.14 of 2024 and accordingly, the Special Judge for Economic Offences
- cum - IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, permitted the complainant to withdraw the prosecution against the accused by its judgment dated 13.02.2026.
2.
Learned standing counsel has placed a copy of the said judgment before this Court and it is placed on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that an amount of Rs.11,30,000/- along with interest was refunded to the petitioner.
4.
Having considered the above factual position, in our considered view no further adjudication is required in the present writ petition, as relief sought by the petitioner is already complied with.
5.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________
BATTU DEVANAND, J
_______________________
TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J
Dated:24.09.2026
TJN
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT PETITION NO: 31844 OF 2025
Dated: 24.9.2026
TJN
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 31844 OF 2025
PROCEEDING SHEET
SL.
NO.
DATE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
24.9.2026
DEV, J & GTK, J
The Writ Petition is closed. (Vide Separate Order) _______
DEV, J
_______
GTK, J TJN