Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3140/2025 of VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO Vs S SURESH KUMAR IAS on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3140/2025 Between: 1. VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. 36-85,

APHC010571292025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3140/2025

Between:

1. VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47

YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. 36-85, PUMSHOTHAMA

PATNAM, CHILAKALURIPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. S

SURESH

KUMAR

IAS,

SPECIAL

CHIEF

SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN

DEVELOPMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

VELAGAPUDI,

AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R-1)

2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR LAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF FINANCE

DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

(R-2)

3. SRI P SAMPATH KUMAR IAS, DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL

ADMINISTRATION, GORANTLA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R-

4. SRI P SRIHARI BABU, COMMISSIONER, CHILAKALURIPET

MUNICIPALITY CHILAKALURIPET, PALNADU DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to please to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the HoniDle High court for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honhle Court dated 19.08.2025 passed in WP No. 15829 of 2024 under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI

2. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI

The Court made the following:

CONTEMPT CASE No.3140 OF 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.15829 of 2024, dated 19.08.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.

2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for co.00nsideration in this contempt case.

3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 24.09.2026 KGM

CONTEMPT CASE No.3140 of 2025 Date: 24.09.2026

KGM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead