Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/24474/2025 of M KIRAN REDDY Vs THE STATE OF AP on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 24474/2025 Between: 1. M KIRAN REDDY, , S/O. M.ANJI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.

APHC010481252025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

WRIT PETITION NO: 24474/2025

Between:

1. M KIRAN REDDY, , S/O. M.ANJI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. FLAT NO.207, BLOCK -A, SRI ANJANEYA

TOWNSHIP, BUNDER ROAD, EDUPUGGALLU, KRISHNA, A.P.

2. SRI BOTTA PHANI KUMAR REDDY,, S/O. B.VENKAT REDDY, AGED

ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. H.NO.8-175, KOTHAGUDEM

VILLAGE,

PULLURU

GRAM

PANCHAYAT,

MYLAVARAM MANDAL, NTR/ KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA

PRADESH.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, EP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WOMEN

AND

CHILD

WELFARE

DEVELOPMENT,

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. THE CHAIRMAN, , UNDER MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF

PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007 AND SUB DIVISIONAL

MAGISTRATE, AND REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDIVADA,

3. THE TAHSILDAR, , GANAVARAM, KRISHNA/NTR DISTRICT, A.P.

4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, GANAVARAM, KRISHNA/NTR DISTRICT, A.P.

5. SMT BOTTA VENKATARATNAM, , W/O. LATE B.RANGAREDDY, C/O.

BOMMAREDDY BUCHI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, R/O.SRI

RAMA GOLDEN NEST APARTMENT, 5 FLOOR, JE-3, CHINNA

AVUTAPALLI

VILLAGE,

GANAVARAM,

KRISHNA

DISTRICT,

ANDHRA PRADESH.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issuance of an appropriate Writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 to 4 in cancelling the registered Gift settlement Deed vide 1667/2009, dated 30.04.2009 and Sale Deed dated 04.06.2025, vide Doc.No.5780/2025 registered at 4TH Respondent, executed by the 2ND

Petitioner in favour of 1ST Petitioner in respect to Ac.0.10 Cents of site at Gannavaram Village, Krishna, through Letter No.NIL, dated 23.07.2025

basing orders passed, by Respondent No.2, vide Rc.H.293/2025, dated 21.07.2025 which are passed by modifying/improving the orders previous passed i.e., Rc.H. 293/2025, dated 31.05.2025 without referring to any law, section or Rules, without waiting till Appeal provision period (60 days), without giving any notice to the 1ST Petitioner and further action of 4TH Respondent issuing by not giving opportunity, and personal hearing by exceeding the Jurisdiction, without jurisdiction, as illegal, arbitrary. Excessive and contrary to the principles of natural Justice, violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (2019) and Rules made therein, in view of the facts and circumstances set out hereunder and pass pleased to suspend the proceedings, Rc.H.293/2025, dated 21.07.2025 by 2ND Respondent and its consequential Letter No.NIL, dated 23.07.2025

issued by the 4TH Respondent in respect to Ac.0.10 Cents of site at Ganavaram, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 12.09.2025 in W.P.

No.24474 of 2025, and pass

may be pleased to disposed of the above writ petition in view of the aforesaid terms and conditions of this Memorandum of Compromise dated 08.08.2026

entered between parties and set-aside the order Rc.H.293/2025, dated 21.07.2025 passed by tribunal, under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (2019) and its Consequential Proceedings taken by other respondents and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. SRINIVAS BASAVA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE

2. GP FOR REVENUE

3. NARESH KUMAR GUNDAPU

4. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

I.A.No.2 of 2026

IN/AND

WRIT PETITION No.24474 OF 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

COMMON ORDER:

The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issuance of an appropriate Writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 to 4 in cancelling the registered Gift settlement Deed vide 1667/2009, dated 30.04.2009 and Sale Deed dated 04.06.2025, vide Doc.No.5780/2025 registered at 4TH Respondent, executed by the 2ND Petitioner in favour of 1ST Petitioner in respect to Ac.0.10 Cents of site at Gannavaram Village, Krishna, through Letter No.NIL, dated 23.07.2025 basing orders passed, by Respondent No.2, vide Rc.H.293/2025, dated 21.07.2025 which are passed by modifying/improving the orders previous passed i.e., Rc.H.293/2025, dated 31.05.2025 without referring to any law, section or Rules, without waiting till Appeal provision period (60 days), without giving any notice to the 1ST Petitioner and further action of 4TH Respondent issuing by not giving opportunity, and personal hearing by exceeding the Jurisdiction, without jurisdiction, as illegal, arbitrary, excessive and contrary to the principles of natural Justice, violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (2019) and Rules made therein, in view of the facts and circumstances set out hereunder and pass such other order or orders.…”

2. Now, the petitioners and respondent No.5 entered into compromise and filed I.A.No.2 of 2026, to record the compromise with following terms and conditions: “…1. That the respondent agreed to withdraw petition Rc.H.293/2025, 24.03.2025 under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (2019).

2. That the Rc.H.293/2025, dated 31.05.2025 and vide Rc.H.293/2025, dated 21.07.2025 will be treated as null and void.

3. That Writ Petitioner No.s.1 and 2 shall maintenance and take care of welfare of respondent.

4. That Respondent shall not make any future claims against the property Ac.0.10 Cents of site at Gannavaram Village, Krishna, gifted to 2nd Petitioner vide registered Gift settlement Deed vide 1667/2009, dated 30.04.2009 and sold to 4th Petitioner vide Sale Deed, dated 04.06.2025, Doc.No.5780/2025 registered at Gannavaram Sub-Registrar.

5. That the parties have agreed to restore the documents validity by getting the NOTE of Cancellation removed at Gannavaram Sub-Registrar.

6. That the writ petitions be disposed of duly recording the aforesaid terms and conditions of this Compromise and the orders passed by the tribunal below be accordingly set-aside.

7. That parties agreed to get all cases closed by restoring position before…”

3. This Court specifically queried the 5th respondent - Senior Citizen about the compromise. Respondent No.5 unequivocally stated that she entered into compromise with the petitioners.

4. Hence, I.A.No.2 of 2026 is allowed.

5. While allowing the claim of the 5th respondent, the Revenue Divisional Officer directed the Sub Registrar to cancel the documents executed by the parties. As the parties have entered into compromise, impugned order dated 31.05.2025 has been set aside by this Court in W.P.No.20722 of 2025, the 4th respondent – Sub Registrar is directed not to cancel any document executed by the parties.

6. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

The Registry is directed to attach a copy of terms and conditions of the compromise to this order.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.09.2026

KBN

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

WRIT PETITION No.24474 of 2025 Date: 24.09.2026

KBN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead