Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/27334/2026 of R V SESHAIAH SARMA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 23 September 2026
reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010501492026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 27334/2026
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement :
Date of uploading :
APHC010501492026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 27334/2026
Between:
1. R V SESHAIAH SARMA, S/O LATE ACHAIAH SARMA, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
OCC.
ARCHAKA
AT
SRI
MAHANADESWARA
SWAMYVARI
DEVASTHANAM,
MAHANADI VILLAGE MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522237
2. THE
COMMISSIONER,
ENDOWMENTS
DEPARTMENT,
GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT 521225
3. SRI MAHANADESWARA SVVAMYVARI DEVASTHANAM, REP.
BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MAHANANDI VILLAGE
MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 518502
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ order or direction
more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action 2nd respondent not deciding the appeal of the petitioner basing on the 3 rd respondent report dated 16.03.2026 as bad, illegal, arbitrary, absurd, violative of principles of natural justice, and violation of Articles 14, 16 21 and 25 of constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on appeal of the petitioner basing on the 3rd respondent report dated 16.03.2026 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the 3rd respondent report dated 16.03.2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D V SASIDHAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
W.P.No.27334 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a direction to implement the orders of this Court passed in W.P.No.3379 of 2022, dated 18.07.2025.
2. Petitioner was appointed as Archaka in the year 1985 on consolidated wages. Subsequently, Petitioner was removed from service in the year 1987, which was confirmed in revision petition on 18.07.1991. Questioning the same, Petitioner filed a writ petition before this Court and the same was disposed of with liberty to file a revision before the Commissioner of Endowments vide order dated 10.11.1993. The revision filed pursuant thereto was dismissed. Questioning the same, Petitioner filed W.P.No.16920 of 2002 and the same was dismissed and the W.A.No.1692 of 2003 filed thereon was disposed of remanding the case to the revisional authority for fresh consideration. As no further orders were passed thereon, Petitioner filed W.P.No.3379 of 2022 and the same was disposed of by order dated 18.07.2025 directing Respondent No.3 therein to pass appropriate orders within a specified time limit. As the orders were not complied, as the limitation period to file contempt case is elapsed, the present writ petition is filed.
3. Heard Sri D.V.Sasidhar, learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-I.
4. Considering the submissions made, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Respondent-authorities to pass appropriate orders taking into consideration the representations of the Petitioner, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 24.09.2026
KLP