Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/4162/2025 of M/s Raghu Constructions Vs Sri Peeyush Kumar IAS on 23 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 25th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4162/2025 Between: 1. M/S RAGHU CONSTRUCTIONS, REPT. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, V.LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O RENUKESWARA RAO,
APHC010696542025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 25th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4162/2025
Between:
1. M/S RAGHU CONSTRUCTIONS, REPT. BY ITS PROPRIETOR,
V.LAKSHMINARAYANA, S/O RENUKESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT
55 YEARS, OCCU CONTRACTOR, H.NO.92/5 OLD H.B COLONY, NEAR RAMALAYAM, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, VIJAYAWADA-520012 NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI
PEEYUSH
KUMAR
IAS,
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
TO
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, FINANCE AND PLANNING
DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. (R-2)
2. SRI
DHYANACHANDRA
H
M
IAS,
COMMISSIONER,
THE
VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VIJAYAWADA, NTR
DISTRICT. (R-3)
3. SRI KATTA SOMAIAH, THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORK
AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. (R-
5).
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents herein, and punish them for willful, deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Honble court in W.P.No.22542 of 2025, dt.28.08.2025, under section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GNANESWARA RAO MITTIREDDI
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
2. KOTHARU VIJAYESWARI
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.4162 OF 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.22542 of 2025, dated 28.08.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 24.09.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.4162 of 2025 Date: 24.09.2026
KGM