Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/3828/2014 of Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Vs A.P State Finandial Corporation, on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE 23 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 3828 OF 2014 Between: 1. Employees Provident Fund Organisation,, Rep. by Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Sub Regional Office, Employees Provident Fund Organization, VUDA Layout, NAD

APHC010640682014

IN TH

WEDNESDA

THE HONOURA

WRI

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Employees Provident Fund Commissioner, Organization, VUDA Layo

1. A P State Finand Newresapuvani pallem, N

2. M/s Ratnagiri Cements Flat No.1047, Vynath Vishakapatnam.

3. Employees Providen (Ministry of Labour and E Scope Minar, Laxmi Naga Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased to issue any writ Certiorari to call for reco E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2 PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL IT PETITION NO: 3828 OF 2014 t Fund Organisation,, Rep. by Assi Sub Regional Office, Employees out, NAD Post, Visakhapatnam. AND dial Corporation, Rep by its Bra Near Doctor Bullayya College, Vishaka s p Ltd, Sri.P.Ajay Kumar, Director, S/ heya Residency, 30-9-99/60,

nt Fund Appellate Tribunal, Rep. b Employment, Government of India) 4t ar, Delhi-110092. le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High or order or direction more particularly ords in ATA No.83(1)2012 on file of DESH

LAPATI istant Provident Provident Fund ...Petitioner anch Manager, apatnam-13 /o.Rama Murthy, Murali Nagar, by its Registar, th Floor, Core 2, ...Respondents aying that in the h Court may be y in the nature of 3rd respondent appellate Tribunal and declare the impugned orders in said appeal No.ATA No.83(1)2012 dt.7-12-2012 as illegal, unjust and quash the same and consequently uphold the recovery notice/prohibitory orders issued by the EPFO IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 3831 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal dt.7-12-2012 in ITA No.83(1) 2012 and batch in the interest of the justice IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 4730 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of impugned orders of the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal in ATA No.83(1) 2012 dt.7.12.2012 pending disposal of Writ Petition in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite hearing of writ the Writ Petition and post the same in the third week of august 2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: T BALAJI(SC FOR EPFO) Counsel for the Respondents: N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: Y N LOHITA

The Court made the following order:

This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order dated 07.12.2012 passed by respondent No.3 in ATA No.83(1) of 2012.

2. Heard Sri T.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri G.R. Sudhakar, learned Standing Counsel for the Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, appearing for respondent No.1.

3. The case against respondent No.2 was dismissed for default vide order dated 16.08.2017.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondent No.1 jointly submitted that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition has already been decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.07.2026 in Writ Petition Nos.34772 of 2013 and batch, and that the present Writ Petition may also be disposed of in terms of the said order.

5. Recording the said submissions, and since the issue involved in the present Writ Petition has already been decided by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present Writ Petition in terms of order dated 03.07.2026 passed in Writ Petition Nos.34772 of 2013 and batch.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. Registry is directed to enclose a copy of the order dated 03.07.2026 passed in Writ Petition Nos.34772 of 2013 and batch to this Writ Petition. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 23.09.2026 MP

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION No.3828 of 2014 Dated : 23.09.2026

MP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead