Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3143/2025 of Vattem Srinivasa Rao, Vs Sri Peeyush Kumar, IAS, on 22 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3143/2025 Between: 1. VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC-
APHC010571222025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3143/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VATTEM SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, R/O. 36-85, PURUSHOTHAMA PATNAM, CHILAKALURIPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R-2)
2. SRI P SRIHARI BABU, COMMISSIONER, CHILAKALURIPET MUNICIPALITY CHILAKALURIPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. (R-4)
3. SRI SHAIK ABDUL RAHIM, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CHILAKALURIPET MUNICIPALITY CHILAKALURIPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. (R-5)
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to please to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the Honble High court for deliberate. intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated 21.08.2025 passed in WP No. 15834 of 2024 under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI
2. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI
The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been complied with.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 23.09.2026 RJS/GCD
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
C.C.NO:3143 of 2025
Dt: 23.09.2026
RJS/GCD