Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/19060/2020 of Swarna Suryaprakasha Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19060/2020 Between: 1. SWARNA SURYAPRAKASHA RAO, S/O LATE VENKATESHWARLU, AGE 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,

APHC010288882020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. SWARNA SURYAPRAKASHA RAO, S/O LATE VENKATESHWARLU, AGE 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O MADDIRALAPADU

VILLAGE, NAGULUPPALA MANDAL, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM

DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT

OF

HOME,

SECRETARIAT,

AMARAVATI.

2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT

ONGOLE.

3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ONGOLE RURAL POLICE

STATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents 2 and 3 in giving effect to the mandatory precaution laid down in Section 17 of The S.C. and S.T. (P.O.A.) Act, 1989 r/w The Amended Act, 2015 and in not giving effect to the representation of the petitioner dated 03- 02-2020 addressed to the respondents 2 and 3 herein as being opposed to Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the

respondents to take preventive action as contemplated under the provisions of The S.C. and S.T. (P.O.A.) Act, 1989 and the Rules framed therein along with the Indian Penal Code and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to act upon the representation of the petitioner dated 03-02-2020 addressed to the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein without further delay so as to protect the lawful rights of the petitioner over the property admeasuring Ac.8-27

cts

situated

in

Sy.No.58/1

RU

of

Maddiralapadu Village, Naguluppalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. G V V A PRASANNAM

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME (AP)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. On the last adjournment i.e., 15.09.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the petition.

2. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J

Date: 23.09.2026 CJP

Date: 23.09.2026 CJP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead