Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/19060/2020 of Swarna Suryaprakasha Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 22 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19060/2020 Between: 1. SWARNA SURYAPRAKASHA RAO, S/O LATE VENKATESHWARLU, AGE 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,
APHC010288882020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. SWARNA SURYAPRAKASHA RAO, S/O LATE VENKATESHWARLU, AGE 65 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O MADDIRALAPADU
VILLAGE, NAGULUPPALA MANDAL, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT
OF
HOME,
SECRETARIAT,
AMARAVATI.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT
ONGOLE.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ONGOLE RURAL POLICE
STATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents 2 and 3 in giving effect to the mandatory precaution laid down in Section 17 of The S.C. and S.T. (P.O.A.) Act, 1989 r/w The Amended Act, 2015 and in not giving effect to the representation of the petitioner dated 03- 02-2020 addressed to the respondents 2 and 3 herein as being opposed to Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the
respondents to take preventive action as contemplated under the provisions of The S.C. and S.T. (P.O.A.) Act, 1989 and the Rules framed therein along with the Indian Penal Code and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to act upon the representation of the petitioner dated 03-02-2020 addressed to the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein without further delay so as to protect the lawful rights of the petitioner over the property admeasuring Ac.8-27
cts
situated
in
Sy.No.58/1
RU
of
Maddiralapadu Village, Naguluppalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G V V A PRASANNAM
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. On the last adjournment i.e., 15.09.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the petition.
2. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J
Date: 23.09.2026 CJP
Date: 23.09.2026 CJP