Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3939/2025 of SUJITH CONSTRUCTION Vs Sri. PEEYUSH KUMAR on 22 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3939/2025 Between: 1. SUJITH CONSTRUCTION, 11-1-189, 2ND LANE, SHANTI NAGAR KOVUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT REP BY
APHC010673922025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3939/2025
Between:
1. SUJITH CONSTRUCTION, 11-1-189, 2ND LANE, SHANTI NAGAR
KOVUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING
PARTNER, D. SUJITH REDDY.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, I.A.S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE
AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT .VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI Y O NANDHAN, COMMISSIONER NELLORE MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT.
3. SRI P V ANIL KUMAR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NELLORE
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful disobedience to the order dated 03.09.2025 passed in W.P. No. 5033 of 2025 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.3939 OF 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.5033 of 2025, dated 03.09.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 23.09.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.3939 of 2025 Date: 23.09.2026
KGM