Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3953/2025 of J PAUL SUNIL Vs KONA SASIDHAR IAS on 22 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3953/2025 Between: 1. J PAUL SUNIL, S/O J.ISAAC, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. LECTURER IN POLITICAL SCIENCE (
APHC010503952025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3953/2025
Between:
1. J PAUL SUNIL, S/O J.ISAAC, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. LECTURER
IN POLITICAL SCIENCE ( UNAIDED),A.C.COLLEGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. KONA SASIDHAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
SCHOOL
EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT,
AP
SECRETARIAT
BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. DR NARAYANA BHARATH GUPTA IAS, COMMISSIONER OF
COLLEGIATE
EDUCATION,
GARUDADRI
KK
TOWERS,
MANGALAGIRI. GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. DR MOSES, THE PRINCIPAL, ANDHRA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the contemnors herein and punish them under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for the utter disobedience and disregard shown to the orders of this Hon'ble dated 17.10.2024 in W P No 20912 of 2012 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay OF 74 days in representing the present C.C
No. 3953 OF 2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J SUDHEER
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM
2. .
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.3953 OF 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the orders passed by this Court have been complied with by the respondent authorities by passing speaking orders dated 26.12.2025, rejecting the claim of the petitioner for absorption against the vacant unaided post. It is submitted that the petitioner would have to challenge the said proceedings, if so advised, as the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.20912 of 2012, dated 17.10.2024, have been complied with. This Court had directed the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1153 of 2023 and batch.
2. The orders passed by this Court have been duly complied with by the respondent authorities and, as such, no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel and the speaking orders passed by the respondent authorities on 26.12.2025, nothing further survives for consideration in this Contempt Case.
4. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. It is left open to the petitioner to challenge the speaking orders passed by the respondent authorities, if so aggrieved. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 23.09.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.3953 of 2025 Date: 23.09.2026
KGM