Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/9747/2020 of Korasika Nageswara Rao, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION Nos: 9747 & 10636 OF 2020 W.P.No.9747 of 2020: Between: 1. KORASIKA NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. LATE VEERLA

APHC010157372020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

WRIT PETITION Nos: 9747 & 10636 OF 2020

W.P.No.9747 of 2020:

Between:

1. KORASIKA NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. LATE VEERLA VENKANNA, AGED 53 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. H.NO.32/1-A, BANDARKOTA, REVENUE WARD NO.32, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. STATE

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

REP.BY

ITS

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY - HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE

MANDAL

EXECUTIVE

MAGISTRATE

AND

TAHSILDAR,

MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

3. JALDHU RAGHURAM KAUSHIK, S/O. KALYANA RAMA, AGED

MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, R/O. D.NO.15/156, MACHAVARAM, EEDEPALLI, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the orders passed by the 2 Respondent in

M.C.No.109/2020, dated 1.6.2020 under Sec.145(1) Cr.P.C. are illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and set aside the same and pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim suspension of the order in M.C.No.109/2020, dated 1.6.2020

under Sec.145(1) Cr.P.C., pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file Counter Affidavit of the 3rd respondent in WP

No.9747/2020, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V SESHA KUMARI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

2. K VENKATESH

W.P.No.10636 of 2020:

Between:

1. JALDU RAM KASYAP, S/O.KALYANA RAMA, AGE.23 YEARS, OCC.STUDENT, R/O.D.NO.15/156, MACHAVARAM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

2. JALDU RAGHU RAMA KOUSHIK, S/O.KALYANA RAMA, AGE.26

YEARS,

OCC.STUDENT,

R/O.D.NO.15/156,

MACHAVARAM,

MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT., REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER

JALDU KALYANA RAMA, S/O.LATE JALDU RAMARAO.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

AT

VELAGAPUDI,

GUNTUR

DISTRICT.

2. THE

DISTRICT

COLLECTOR,

KRISHNA

DISTRICT

AT

MACHILIPATNAM.

3. THE

MANDAL

EXECUTIVE

MAGISTRATE

AND

TAHSILDAR,

MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

4. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT

MACHILIPATNAM

5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILAKALAPUDI P.S., KRISHNA

DISTRICT.

6. KORASIKA

NAGESWARA

RAO,

S/O.VEERLA

VENKANNA,

R/O.D.NO.23-79-2, RAMANAIDU PETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA

DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 5 to implement the order passed by the 3rd respondent in M.C.No.109/2020, dt.1- 6-2020 under Sec.145 of Cr.P.C. in accordance with law by preventing the 6th respondent and his associates from entering and making constructions in the disputed land of an extent of Ac.7.89 cents in R.S.No.127 of Bander East Area of Machilipatnam Mandal, Krishna District and also direct the respondents 2 to 5 to consider the representation of the petitioners dt.6-6-2020 and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. K VENKATESH

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. V SESHA KUMARI

The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

WRIT PETITION Nos: 9747 & 10636 OF 2020

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

COMMON ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that these writ petitions became infructuous as the order under Section 145 Cr.P.C is passed on 01.06.2020.

Recorded the said submission.

In the result, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, the pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J

Dt:23.09.2026 Vns

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead