Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9747/2020 of Korasika Nageswara Rao, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 22 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION Nos: 9747 & 10636 OF 2020 W.P.No.9747 of 2020: Between: 1. KORASIKA NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. LATE VEERLA
APHC010157372020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
WRIT PETITION Nos: 9747 & 10636 OF 2020
W.P.No.9747 of 2020:
Between:
1. KORASIKA NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O. LATE VEERLA VENKANNA, AGED 53 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. H.NO.32/1-A, BANDARKOTA, REVENUE WARD NO.32, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REP.BY
ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY - HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE
MANDAL
EXECUTIVE
MAGISTRATE
AND
TAHSILDAR,
MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. JALDHU RAGHURAM KAUSHIK, S/O. KALYANA RAMA, AGED
MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, R/O. D.NO.15/156, MACHAVARAM, EEDEPALLI, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the orders passed by the 2 Respondent in
M.C.No.109/2020, dated 1.6.2020 under Sec.145(1) Cr.P.C. are illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and set aside the same and pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim suspension of the order in M.C.No.109/2020, dated 1.6.2020
under Sec.145(1) Cr.P.C., pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file Counter Affidavit of the 3rd respondent in WP
No.9747/2020, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V SESHA KUMARI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. K VENKATESH
W.P.No.10636 of 2020:
Between:
1. JALDU RAM KASYAP, S/O.KALYANA RAMA, AGE.23 YEARS, OCC.STUDENT, R/O.D.NO.15/156, MACHAVARAM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. JALDU RAGHU RAMA KOUSHIK, S/O.KALYANA RAMA, AGE.26
YEARS,
OCC.STUDENT,
R/O.D.NO.15/156,
MACHAVARAM,
MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT., REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER
JALDU KALYANA RAMA, S/O.LATE JALDU RAMARAO.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
AT
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
KRISHNA
DISTRICT
AT
MACHILIPATNAM.
3. THE
MANDAL
EXECUTIVE
MAGISTRATE
AND
TAHSILDAR,
MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT
MACHILIPATNAM
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILAKALAPUDI P.S., KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
6. KORASIKA
NAGESWARA
RAO,
S/O.VEERLA
VENKANNA,
R/O.D.NO.23-79-2, RAMANAIDU PETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 5 to implement the order passed by the 3rd respondent in M.C.No.109/2020, dt.1- 6-2020 under Sec.145 of Cr.P.C. in accordance with law by preventing the 6th respondent and his associates from entering and making constructions in the disputed land of an extent of Ac.7.89 cents in R.S.No.127 of Bander East Area of Machilipatnam Mandal, Krishna District and also direct the respondents 2 to 5 to consider the representation of the petitioners dt.6-6-2020 and to pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K VENKATESH
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. V SESHA KUMARI
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
WRIT PETITION Nos: 9747 & 10636 OF 2020
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that these writ petitions became infructuous as the order under Section 145 Cr.P.C is passed on 01.06.2020.
Recorded the said submission.
In the result, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J
Dt:23.09.2026 Vns