Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1411/2010 of PASUMARTHI RAMA RAO, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DIST., & ANR. Vs THE STATE OF A.P., REP. BY P.P., HYDERABAD. on 22 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1411/2010 Between: 1. PASUMARTHI RAMA RAO, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DIST., & ANR., S/O.
APHC010068312010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1411/2010
Between:
1. PASUMARTHI RAMA RAO, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DIST., & ANR., S/O.
SATYANARAYANA BUSINESS R/O. RAJA APARTMENTS - II, 4TH
FLOOR, SHYAMALA NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY,
2. PASUMARTHI PERRAJU, S/O. SATYANARAYANA LANDLORD R/O.
INDUS RESIDENCY, 4TH FLOOR, FLAT NO.2, SHYAMALA NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY,
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF A P REP BY P P HYDERABAD, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the Judgment dated 02-08-2010 in Crl.A. No. 260 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the IV Addl. Sessions Judge, East Godavari, Kakinada, confirming the Judgment dated 03-09-2007 in C.C. No. 492 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Addl. J.F.C. Magistrate, Peddapuram, otherwise Petitioners will suffer serious hardship.
IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 2057 OF 2010
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Judgment dated 02-08-2010 in Crl.A. No. 260 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the IV Addl. Sessions Judge, East Godavari, Kakinada, and enlarge the petitionrs on bail in C.C. No. 492 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Addl. J.F.C. Magistrate, Peddapuram, pending disposal of the Crl.P.
SS,J
Crl.R.C.No.1411 of 2010
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. M SIVANANDA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following
SS,J
Crl.R.C.No.1411 of 2010
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1411/2010
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The instant Criminal Revision has been preferred against the common judgment dated 02.08.2010 in Criminal Appeal No.260 of 2007, passed by the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, East Godavari, Kakinada confirming the judgment dated 03.09.2007 in C.C.No.492 of 2003, passed by the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Peddapuram.
2. This Court, vide order dated 17.09.2025, directed the State to place the death certificate of present petitioners. In terms of such directions, Sub- Inspector of Police, Gandepalli Police Station, Kakinda District has placed a report contending inter alia that both the petitioners had expired long ago. However, the State could secure only the death certificate of petitioner no.1, namely, Pasumarthi Ramarao, who expired on 11.04.2018. The death certificate of petitioner no.2, namely, Pasumarthi Perraju could not be secured. Let the report of Sub-Inspector of Police be taken on record.
3. This matter has been pending since 2010.
4. At the time of appeal, i.e., in the year 2007, petitioner no.2 herein was aged about 74 years. More than 20 years have already elapsed since the impugned order passed by the learned appellate Court.
5. Considering the situation, this Court has taken note of the report filed by the State that both the petitioners/accused persons have expired. Since both
SS,J Crl.R.C.No.1411 of 2010
the accused persons are no more, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court in the instant criminal revision.
6. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
Date:23.09.2026
mmk/ev
SS,J
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:1411of 2010
23.09.2026
mmk/ev