Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/343/2023 of P MAHESH Vs THE STATE OF AP on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 343/2023 Between: 1. P MAHESH, S/O. P.BHUVANA, AGED 45 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. PJP CAMP ROAD, PEBBERU,

APHC010725282022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. P MAHESH, S/O. P.BHUVANA, AGED 45 YRS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. PJP CAMP ROAD, PEBBERU, WANAPARTHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 518 422.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA

PRADESH.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR

DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. THE

SUPERINTENDENT

OF

POLICE,

KURNOOL

DISTRICT,

ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IV-TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of mandamus declaring the illegal action of the Respondent No./1 in harassing the Petitioner by summoning the Petitioner to the IV-Town Police Station, Kurnool District and threatening the Petitioner to come to Kurnool from his residence at Hyderabad without any reason, which is illegal, arbitrary, and also violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently, direct the

Respondents not to harass the Petitioner illegally and direct the Respondent Police to follow the Procedure prescribed under the Law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 not to harass the Petitioner by Summoning the Petitioner to the IV-Town Police Station, Kurnool District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. Y BALAJI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. Sri Srinath Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri Y Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter became infructuous and requested to dismiss this petition.

2. Recorded the said submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J

Date: 22.09.2026 SSA

Date: 22.09.2026 SSA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead