CRLP/8419/2026 of Harijana Badesab Alias Gripson Vs K Amulya Rathna on 21 September 2026

1. HARIJANA BADESAB AGED ABOUT 30 Y BELAGAL MANDAL, K

2. HARIJANA SATYAVE 70 YEARS, R/O K. S KURNOOL DISTRICT

1. K AMULYA RATHNA ABOUT

Y MANDAL,KURNOOL D

2. THE STATE OF A PROSECUTOR, HIGH 522239

Petition under Section circumstances stated in the High Court to quash the p Hon’ble Judicial Magistrate of 2026 of Veldurthy Polic with Section 3(5) of the Prohibition Act, 1961, insofa

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) HE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT RI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNC NAL PETITION NO: 8419/2026 B ALIAS GRIPSON, S/O LATE DU YEARS, R/O K. SINGAVARAM VIL KURNOOL DISTRICT EDAMMA, W/O LATE DUBBANNA, AGE SINGAVARAM VILLAGE, C. BELAGAL T. ...PETITIONER/ACC AND A, W/O HARIJANA BADESAB GRIPSO YEARS,R/O VELDURTHY VILL DISTRICT. -518216. ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS H COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AM ...RESPONDENT/COMPLA 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying e Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal P proceedings in C.C. No. 681 of 2026 on of First Class, Dhone, arising out of Cr ce Station, for the offences under Secti BNS, 2023 and Sections 3 & 4 of ar as the Petitioners/A-1 and A-2 are co

CHEAM UBBANNA, LAGE, C. ED ABOUT MANDAL, CUSED(S) ON, AGED LAGEAND S PUBLIC MARAVATI- INANT(S): g that in the Petition, the n file of the rime No. 68 on 85 read the Dowry oncerned,

MRK,J Crl.P.No.8419 of 2026

IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the original certified copy of CC No.681, dated 18.07.2026 on the file of In the Court of Honble Judicial Magistrate of First Class - Dhone before this Hon’ble Court IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C. No. 681 of 2026 on the file of the Hon’ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone, including the appearance of the Petitioners, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):

1. C.YELLAIAH

2. C YELLAIAH Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

2. MRK,J Crl.P.No.8419 of 2026

The Court made the following Order:

Instant Criminal Petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023, has been filed on behalf of the petitioners herein (A1 & A2), seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.681 of 2026 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone, wherein they were charged with the offences punishable under Section 85 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent No.2.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for some time, has confined his argument to the extent of dispensing with the presence of the petitioners (A1 & A2) before the trial Court by submitting petitioners’ practical constraints in attending before the trial Court and states that petitioners shall not dispute their identity at a later stage of proceedings.

4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor contended that specific accusations have been made as against the petitioners herein and truth or otherwise of the said accusations has to be decided during the course of trial, hence, there are no grounds to quash the proceedings at this stage. So far as dispensing with the presence of the petitioners herein, before the trial Court, he has not opposed the same.

MRK,J Crl.P.No.8419 of 2026

5. Since there are specific accusations that have been made as against the petitioners herein, which are all disputed questions of fact, the same can be decided during the course of trial, and this Court, in a petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 corresponding to Section 482 Cr.P.C., would not be in a position to conduct roving enquiry into the disputed questions of fact and quash the proceedings at this stage.

6. In this context, it is apt to note the dictum held in State of Uttar Pradesh and Another Vs. Akhil Sharda and Others1, by the Apex Court in its vivid terms in the following way:

7. Having gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court by which the High Court has set aside the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it appears that the High Court has virtually conducted a mini trial, which as such is not permissible at this stage and while deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. As observed and held by this Court in a catena of decisions no mini trial can be conducted by the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., jurisdiction and at the stage of deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court cannot get into appreciation of evidence of the particular case being considered.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings against the petitioners herein. However, due to ground realities submitted by the counsel for the petitioners, presence of petitioners herein (A1 & A2) before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, 12022 LiveLaw (SC) 594

MRK,J Crl.P.No.8419 of 2026

Dhone, in C.C.No.681 of 2026 is hereby dispensed with, except on those dates when the learned trial Court feels that their presence is necessary. In the event of failure of the petitioners to appear, when the trial Court specifically directs, this Order shall stands automatically revoked, without recourse to this Court.

8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

9. Needless to state that the petitioners are at liberty to raise all the grounds before the trial Court.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J

Dated: 22.09.2026 MDP