Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/27077/2026 of Talari Maruthi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 27077/2026 Between: 1. TALARI MARUTHI,, S/O TALARI ANJANAIAH, AGED ABOUT .38 YEARS, OCC. HOMEGUARD, RESIDING

APHC010497212026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 27077/2026

Between:

1. TALARI MARUTHI,, S/O TALARI ANJANAIAH, AGED ABOUT .38

YEARS, OCC. HOMEGUARD, RESIDING AT. D.NO.19-109, PATTIKONDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. - 518380.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI .GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522237

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. -518002

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PATTIKONDA, KURNOOL

DISTRICT.-518380

4. THE TAHSILDHAR, MADDIKAERA, KURNOOL DISTRICT.-518385

5. TALARI ANAJAIAH, S/O TALARI ANJANAIAH, AGED ABOUT .38

YEARS, OCC. REVENUE INSPECTOR, RESIDING AT. D.NO.19- 109, PATTIKONDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. -518380.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of respondents in not considering the representation dt.17-08-2026 for

conducting proper enquiry into the compassionate appointment of respondent no.5 illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct to consider the representation dt.17-08-2026

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to consider the representation dt.17- 08-2026

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PALEGARI JAYACHANDRA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION No.27077 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. No order as to costs.

5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

Date: 22.09.2026 Pmk

WRIT PETITION No.27077 of 2026 Dated: 22.09.2026

Pmk

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead