Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/8892/2023 of THUBATI SATYA NAGESWARA RAO WITHDRAWN Vs THE STATE OF AP on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 8892/2023 Between: 1. THUBATI SATYA NAGESWARA RAO WITHDRAWN, S/O.VEERAIAH AGED 55 YEARS,

APHC010173662023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 8892/2023

Between:

1. THUBATI SATYA NAGESWARA RAO WITHDRAWN, S/O.VEERAIAH

AGED

YEARS,

R/O.H.NO.3-35,

SRINIVASA

GIRIJANA

COLONY,YELLAMANDA

VILLAGE,

NARASARAOPET

MANDAL,

GUNTUR/PALANADU DISTRICT. WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS

WITHDRAWN SO FAR AS PETITIONER NO.1 IS CONCERNED AS

PER COURTS ORDER DT. 15.09.2026.

2. MANUGONDA RAMAKRISHNA,, S/O. SUBBARAO, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC

LABOUR,

R/O.H.NO.2-11,

YELLAMANDA

VILLAGE,

NARASARAOPET MANDAL, GUNTUR/PALANADU DISTRICT.

3. AMBATI SAI RAM,, SIO. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 28 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.2-31, YELLAMANDA

VILLAGE,

MANDAL, GUNTUR./PALNADU DISTRICT

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL

ADMINISTRATION

AND

URBAN

DEVELOPMENT

VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE

COMMISSIONER

AND

DIRECTOR

OF

MUNICIPAL

ADMINISTRATION

DEPARTMENT,

,

B'BLOCK,

AP

SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT.

4. THE

DISTRICT

COLLECTOR,

NARASARAOPET,

PALNADU

DISTRICT.

5. THE

NARASARAOPET

MUNICIPALITY,

NARASARAOPET,

PALANADU DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

6. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, 1ST

FLOOR , NEW HOD'S BUILDING, INDIRA GANDHI MUNICIPAL

STADIUM, M. G. ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520010

7. THE

DISTRICT

PANCHAYAT

OFFICER,

,NARASARAOPET,

GUNTUR/PALANADU DISTRICT.

8. THE

COMMISSIONER,

PANCHAYAT

RAJ

AND

RURAL

DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT,

GOVERNMENT

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH, NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, YELLAMANDA GRAM PANCHAYAT, YELLAMANDA

VILLAGE,

MANDAL,GUNTUR/PALANADU DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents, in seeking to conduct municipal elections to the population in Survey No. 296 to 307/A, Narsaraopet Municipality, Palnadu District, though the area sought to be included in the 5th respondent is not yet completed, while the process under the AP Town Planning Act and Rules is going on, further seeking to conduct elections to the Gram Panchayat limits of Yellamanda village, without following the rule of reservation, without segregating the voters in both the areas of the same village as arbitrary, unjust, illegal, misuse of power, favoritism shown by the authorities, violative of the AP Municipalities Act and AP Grampanchayat Act, Rules made there under apart being violative of Articles 14,19 and Part IX and IX-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to hold elections to the area covered under erstwhile Yellamanda grampanchayat and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to conduct elections in Survey No. 296

to 307/A, Narsaraopet Municipality, Palnadu District and Yellamanda grampanchayat until the entire process contemplated under chapter IX and IX- A of the Constitution of India and the procedure prescribed under the AP

Municipalities Act and AP Grampanchayat Act, Rules made there under, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. T VENU GOPAL

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

3. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S

4. M MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR MUNC AND MUNC CORP )

5. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:-

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date:22.09.2026 MVK

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 8892 of 2023

Date:22.09.2026 MVK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead