Andhra Pradesh High Court
MACMA/2333/2009 of NEELAM RAMA SUBBAMMA Vs NEELAM HIMABINDU @ V. ADI LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS on 21 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2333/2009 Between: NEELAM RAMA SUBBAMMA, W/O. LATE SUBBARAYUDU
APHC010129702009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2333/2009
Between:
NEELAM
RAMA
SUBBAMMA,
W/O.
LATE
SUBBARAYUDU
HOUSEHOLD
R/O.
H.NO.
1-161,
EDIGAPALEM
STREET,
RAJAMPET, KADAPA DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. NEELAM HIMABINDU V ADI LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS, W/O.
LATE NEELAM VENKATA SUBRAMANYAM VARAPRASAD R/O.
13/13,
SAINATHAPURAM,
MYDUKUR
MANDAL,
KADAPA
DISTRICT.
2. NEELAM SAI SNEHA, D/O. LATE N.V.S. VARAPRASAD MINOR
REP. BY MOTHER I.E., RESPONDENT NO.1 R/O. 13/13, SAINATHAPURAM, MYDUKUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.
3. K SURESH BABU, S/O. K. PRASAD R/O. D.NO. 14-301, SAINATHAPURAM, MYDUKUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. UNITED
INDIA
INSURANCE
COMPANY
LIMITED,
REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER PRODDATUR
KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Court being aggrieved by the award and decree dated 17.10.2006 passed in O.P. No.
75 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal- cum-II Addl. District Judge, Kadapa, at Proddatur, for the following among other Counsel for the Appellant:
VENKATESHWAR VARANASI
Page 1 of 2
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY
2. A JAYANTHI
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
1. Despite the learned counsel on record represented the appellant/claimant No.3, none appeared for the appellant, when the matter is taken up for hearing. It is evident from the record that the appeal is of the year, 2009 and the accident occurred on 11.12.2002, but the appellant did not evince any interest to prosecute the matter, thereby, the same is liable for dismissal.
2. Therefore, the M.A.C.M.A. is dismissed for non prosecution. Interim orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, stand closed.
________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 22.09.2026 Krs
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
M.A.C.M.A.No.2333 of 2009
( JUDGMENT )
DATE: 22.09.2026
Krs
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…