Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/11660/2026 of SIRIPURAM MOHANA RAO Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 20 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11660 OF 2026 Between: 1. SIRIPURAM MOHANA RAO, S/o Karrenna, Aged about 60 years Occ

::1::

APHC010214422026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 11660 OF 2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SIRIPURAM MOHANA RAO, S/o Karrenna, Aged about 60 years Occ Senior Citizen R/o D.no.1-195,Pedda Street,DhanaupuramVillage, Tampa post Hiramanadal Mandal.Srikakulam District.

2. Siripuram Srilatha, W/o Syamala Rao, Aged about 25 years Occ House wife R/o D.no.1-195, Pedda Street,Dhanaupuram Village, Tampa post HiramanadalMandal,Srikakulam District. ...Petitioners AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Home Department A.P Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.522 238

2. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam Srikakulam District.532 001

3. The Station House Officer, Hiramanadalam Police Station , Srikakulam District.532 001

::2::

4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Hiramanadalam Police Station Srikakulam District.532 001

5. Darapu Dilli, S/o Narayana Aged about 46 years Occ sarpanch R/oDhanaupuramVillage,Tampa post HiramanadalamMandal,Srikakulam District.532 459

6. Darapu Raju, W/o Shanmuka Rao Aged about 52 years Occ housewife R/oDhanaupuramVillage, Tampa post HiramanadalamMandal,Srikakulam District.532 459

7. Darapuuma, W/o Sampath Aged about 48 years Occ housewife R/oDhanaupuram Village, Tampa post HiramanadalamMandal,Srikakulam District.532 459

8. Anguru Bhaskara Rao, S/o peddaappayya Aged about 63 years Occ not known R/oDhanaupuram Village, Tampa post HiramanadalamMandal,Srikakulam District.532 459

9. Anguru Padma, W/o Bhaskara Rao Aged about 47 years Occ house wife R/o DhanaupuramVillage,Tampa post HiramanadalamMandal,Srikakulam District.532 459

10. Anguru Srinu, S/o Bhaskara Rao Aged about 44 years Occ not known R/oDhanaupuramVillage,Tampa post HiramanadalamMandal,Srikakulam District 532 459

11. Anguru Ramya, W/o Srinu Aged about 31 years Occ House wife R/oDhanaupuramVillage,Tampa post HiramanadalamMandal,Srikakulam District.532 459

::3::

12. Darapu yetheswara Rao, S/o Govinda Aged about 60 years Occ not known R/oDhanaupuramVillage,Tampa post HiramanadalamMandal,Srikakulam District.532 459

13. DarapuJoginaidu, S/o Chandrayya Aged about 63 years Occ not known R/oDhanaupuramVillage,Tampa post HiramanadalamMandal,Srikakulam District.532 459

14. DarapuVijayamma, W/o Joginaidu Aged about 56 years Occ house wife R/oDhanaupuramVillage,Tampa post HiramanadalamMandal,Srikakulam District.532 459

15. Darapu Ashok, S/o joginaidu Aged about 36 years Occ not known R/oDhanaupuramVillage,Tampa post HiramanadalamMandal,SrikakuIam District.532 459. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to that this Honble Court may be issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the inaction of the Respondents no.2 to 4 to registering the crime against the respondent no.5 to 15on petitioner complaint dt 12.01.2026/05.01.2026 in FIR in cr.no.03/2026 on the file of Hiramandalam Police station Srikakulam district is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14, 21 of Constitution of India and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct Respondents No.2 to 4 to registering the crime against the respondent no.5 to 15on petitioner complaint dt

::4::

12.01.2026/05.01.2026 in FIR in cr.no.03/2026 on the file of Hiramandalam Police station Srikakulam district by conducting proper investigation in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioners: TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

::5::

WRIT PETITION NO: 11660 of 2026 The Court made the following Order:

Instant Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed on behalf of petitioners, for the following relief: “ to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the inaction of the Respondents no.2 to 4 to registering the crime against the respondent no.5 to 15 on petitioner complaint dt 12.01.2026/05.01.2026 in FIR in cr.no.03/2026 on the file of Hiramandalam Police station Srikakulam district is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14, 21 of Constitution of India and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct Respondents No.2 to 4 to registering the crime against the respondent no.5 to 15 on petitioner complaint dt 12.01.2026/05.01.2026 in FIR in cr.no.03/2026 on the file of Hiramandalam Police station Srikakulam district by conducting proper investigation in accordance with law and pass”

2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, states that police, after due investigation, filed charge-sheet in FIR in Crime No.03 of 2026 of Hiramandalam Police Station, Srikakulam District before Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothuru, Srikakulam District, against Darapu Shanmukha Rao

::6::

(A1) and Darapu Sampati Rao (A2). A copy of written instructions of Station House Officer, Hiramandalam Police Station, Srikakulam District also forwarded to learned counsel for petitioners.

3. At that juncture, learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition to work out their legal remedies in accordance with law.

4. Considering submissions made by both the counsel, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is made clear that all the remedies are left open to the respective parties to proceed, in accordance with the law. No costs.

Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 21.09.2026 KRK

::7::

52

WRIT PETITION NO: 11660 of 2026

Date: 21.09.2026 KRK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead