Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9464/2014 of P. Rajeshwar Rao, S/o. Appa Rao, Vs The Commissioner & Registrar of Co-operative Societies, on 20 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 3960 and 9464 of 2014 WP.no.3960 of 2014 Between: 1. T.V. RAMANA MURTHY.,, S/O. T. JANARDHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 58
APHC010273412014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 3960 and 9464 of 2014
WP.no.3960 of 2014
Between:
1. T.V. RAMANA MURTHY.,, S/O. T. JANARDHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT
58 YEARS, OCC: RETD., R/O. FLAT NO. 106, VISHNU SATYA
APARTMENTS, VARADAIAH NAGAR. KHAMMAM.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. COMMISSIONER REGISTRAR OF COOPERAT SOCIETY HYD 3
OTHE, SOCIETIES, HYDERABAD, A.P.
2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR/ DISTRICT COOPERATIVE, OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. THE
DEPUTY
REGISTRAR
OF
COOPERATIVE
SOCIETIES,
YELAMANCHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, N.T.R.
SAHAKARA BHAWAN, MARRIPALEM, VUDA LAYOUT N.A.D. POST
VISHAKAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction or writ more appropriately a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in issuing Surcharge Notice under Section 60 of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act in Rc.Nos.1 to 8/895/2004-C dated 24.05.2005 and the consequential Relieving Certificate issued by the 4th Respondent in Estt./SP No.239/2013-14 dated 31.10.2013
as arbitrary, illegal, violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution of India and set aside the same and pass.
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
suspend the all further proceedings pursuant to the proceedings of the 3rd respondent in RC.No.1
to
8/895/2004-C,
dt.
24-05-2005
and
the
consequential relieving certificate issued by the 4th respondent in Estt./SP.No.
239/2013-14, dt. 31-10-2013, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass.
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP 3498 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
vacate the interim orders dt. 12.02.2014, made in WPMP No. 4873/14, in WP
No. 3960/14.
IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 98756 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S SRI RAM REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. 7116/V UMA DEVI
2. 15523/GP FOR COOPERATION (AP)
3. GP FOR COOPERATION
W.P.No.9464 of 2014
Between:
1. P. RAJESHWAR RAO, S/O. APPA RAO,, OCC: RETD., ASSISTANT
MANAGER, R/O. SHARADA NAGAR, NEAR VIKAS HIGH SCHOOL, NARSI PATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE COMMISSIONER REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, HYDERABAD, A.P.
2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR/ DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. THE
DEPUTY
REGISTRAR
OF
COOPERATIVE
SOCIETIES,
YELAMANCHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, N.T.R.
SAHAKARA BHAWAN, MARRIPALEM, VUDA LAYOUT N.A.D. POST
VISHAKAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction or writ more appropriately a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in issuing Surcharge Notice under Section 60 of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act in Rc.Nos. 1 to 8/895/2004-C dated 24.05.2005 as arbitrary, illegal, violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution of India and set aside the same.
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
suspend all further proceedings pursuant to the proceedings of the 3rd Respondent in Rc.Nos.1 to 8/895/2004-C dated 24.05.2005, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP 3489 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
vacate the interim orders dt. 28.03.2014, made in WPMP No. 11888/14, in WP
No. 9464/14.
IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 98755 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S SRI RAM REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP)
2. V UMA DEVI
3. GP FOR COOPERATION
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION Nos.3960 and 9464 of 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the declaration of surcharge under Section 60 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, vide Rc.Nos.1 to 8/895/2004-C, dated 24.05.2005, and the consequential relieving certificate issued by respondent No.4 on 31.10.2014, which are under challenge in the present writ petitions.
2. This Court, while admitting the writ petitions, suspended the surcharge proceedings dated 24.05.2005 issued by respondent No.3, vide orders dated 12.02.2014 in W.P.No.3960 of 2014 and 28.03.2014 in W.P.No.9464 of 2014.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the surcharge proceedings were issued against the President and other members, including the petitioners. It is submitted that similar proceedings were challenged in W.P.No.2438 of 2006 by the President of the Society, who challenged the proceedings initiated against him, and this Court, vide order dated 14.02.2018, set aside the impugned proceedings. The order passed in W.P.No.2438 of 2006 was also considered while setting aside similar proceedings in W.P.No.11847 of 2006, and the impugned proceedings therein were set aside by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 26.02.2020.
4. It is submitted that the petitioners are also members who are aggrieved by the impugned proceedings, which have already been set aside by this Court. Considering the same and following the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.2438 of 2006, the present writ petitions are allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 21.09.2026 KGM Whether the order is: Speaking
Reasoned ☑ Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
WRIT PETITION Nos.3960 and 9464 of 2014 Dated 21.09.2026
KGM