Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/18462/2026 of Arigili Ravi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 18 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 18462 OF 2026 Between: 1. Arigili Ravi,, S/o.A.Thirupalu, Aged about 48 years, R/o.69/176, Joharapuram,
APHC010043772026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Arigili Ravi,, S/o.A.Thirupalu, Aged about 48 years, R/o.69/176, Joharapuram, Kurnool, Knl-Camp-b Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh - 518002 ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, , Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District - 522238
2. The Director of Town and Country Planning, MA And UD Department ,Tadepalli, Magalagiri Guntur District - 522501.
3. The Kurnool Municipal Corporation, , Rep by it's The Commissioner, Kurnool, Kurnool District - 518002
4. The Deputy City Planner, The Kurnool Municipal Corporation, Kurnool, Kurnool District - 518002
5. The Ward Planning and Regulation Secretary, The Kurnool Municipal Corporation, Kurnool, Kurnool District - 518002
6. The Town Surveyor, The Kurnool Municipal Corporation, Kurnool, Kurnool District - 518002
7. The District Collector, Kurnool, Kurnool District - 518002
...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ to declare the action of the Respondents in not removing illegal constructions/encroachments in L.P.No.88/1987 Joy Homes Layout as arbitrary and illegal and Consequently direct the Respondents to demolish all unauthorized structures i.e houses in park and road areas and restore the layout as per sanctioned plan and take action against encroachers as per law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Condone the delay in resubmitting the 147 days in the present Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents to demolish all unauthorized structures i.e houses in park and road areas and restore the layout as per sanctioned plan and take action against encroachers as per law pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: BUCHIGARI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents: POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents: GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
The Court made the following Order:
Sri N. Venkatesh, learned counsel representing Sri Buchigari Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 19-09-2026 MSI
Dated: 19-09-2026 MSI