Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLP/9389/2025 of A RAJESWARI Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 18 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] SATURDAY, THE 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9389/2025 Between: 1. A RAJESWARI, W/O. KONDA REDDY, AGED 43 YEARS, 2. A . KONDA REDDY,, S/O.

APHC010451732025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

SATURDAY, THE 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9389/2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. A RAJESWARI, W/O. KONDA REDDY, AGED 43 YEARS,

2. A. KONDA REDDY,, S/O. CHINNA MALAKONDA REDDY, AGED 54 YEARS.

3. A. KONDA REDDY,, S/O. NARASA REDDY, AGED 78 YEARS

4. A. BALI REDDY,, S/O. KONDA REDDY AGED 41 YEARS.

5. A.KRISHNA REDDY,, S/O. NARASA REDDY, AGED 67 YEARS.

6. A.CHINNA KONDA REDDY,, S/O. KONDA REDDY, AGED 54 YEARS.

7. A.DAMODAR REDDY,, S/O. DASARATHA RAMI REDDY AGED 51 YEARS.

8. PALA RAMESH REDDY,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 32 YEARS,

9. NUKARAJU VENGALA REDDY,, S/O. SRI RAMULU REDDY, AGED 48 YEARS.

10. K. MAHENDRA REDDY,, S/O. MALAKONDA REDDY, AGED 43 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF PANDIPADU VILLAGE, A.S. PETA MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI,

HIGH COURT BUILDINGS AT NELAPADU, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. KAPPALA VENKATA SWAMY, S/O.BODIYYA, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. PANDIPADU VILLAGE, A.S.PETA MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR.No.58 of 2025 dt.26.06.2025 on the file of SHO, A.S.Peta, SPSR Nellore District IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the original certified copy of FIR.No.58 of 2025 dt.26.06.2025 on the file of SHO A.S.Peta, SPSR Nellore District, before this Hon’ble Court IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FIR.No.58 of 2025 dt.26.06.2025 on the file of SHO, A.S.Peta, SPSR Nellore District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):

1. V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9389 of 2025 The Court made the following Order:

Instant Criminal Petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of the petitioners herein (A1 to A10), seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR in Crime No.58 of 2025 dated 26.06.2025 of A.S.Peta Police Station, SPSR Nellore District, for the offences punishable under Sections 329(3), 115(2), 351(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

2. At the stage of admission, this Court has not granted any interim order in the instant lis.

3. Sri K.Sandeep, learned Aassistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent-State, basing on the written instructions, submits that the police have filed a charge sheet in FIR in Crime No. 58 of 2025 dated 26.06.2025 of A.S.Peta Police Station, SPSR Nellore District, before the jurisdictional Magistrate.

4. At that juncture, Sri R.Lakshmikar, learned counsel representing Sri V.Vinod K Reddy, counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition with a liberty to challenge the charge sheet.

5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, by granting liberty to work out their legal remedies, in accordance with the law.

Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 19.09.2026 RMR

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9389 of 2025

Date: 19.09.2026 RMR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead