Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10894/2023 of YEKULA SYAMA SUNDARA SURESH Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 18 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] SATURDAY, THE 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 10894/2023 Between: 1. YEKULA SYAMA SUNDARA SURESH, S/O. LATE Y. PANDURANGA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS,
APHC010208642023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
WRIT PETITION NO: 10894/2023
Between:
1. YEKULA SYAMA SUNDARA SURESH, S/O. LATE Y. PANDURANGA
RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC.ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
WORKING IN A.P. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
LTD., R/O.FLAT NO.302, AVANTHIKA JAHNAVI APARTMENTS, PLOT NO.557, MATHRU SRI NAGAR, MIYAPUR, HYDERABAD.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPT. BY SPECIAL CHIEF
SECRETARY,
FINANCE
DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT,
AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPT. BY SPECIAL CHIEF
SECRETARY,
INDUSTRIES
AND
COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. A P INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, REPT. BY
ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, 12-455, WARD
NO.12, BYPASS ROAD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DIST - 522 501.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of respondents in enhancing the age of superannuation from 60 yrs to 62 yrs for the employees working in 3rd respondent Corporation in terms of G.O.Ms.No.15,
dt.31-01-2022 issued by the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal violation of Articles 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to enhance the age of superannuation of the petitioner from 60
yrs to 62 yrs on par with the Government employees in terms of G.O.Ms.No.15, dt.31-01-2022 issued by the 1st respondent in the interest of justice.
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to continue the petitioner in service till he attains the age of superannuation of 62 years in terms of G.O.Ms.No.15, dt.31-01- 2022 issued by the 1st respondent with all the consequential benefits including regular pay and allowances pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. O UDAYA KUMAR
2. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the same, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the present Writ Petition.
3. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
Date.19.09.2026 SR