Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/564/2026 of G. Ravi Kumar, Vs Sri B. Sudhakara Rao, on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 564/2026 Between: 1. G. RAVI KUMAR,, S/O APPALANAIDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC FIELD ASSISTANT (REMOVED) R/O

APHC010057732026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 564/2026

Between:

1. G. RAVI KUMAR,, S/O APPALANAIDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC FIELD ASSISTANT (REMOVED) R/O RAVADA VILLAGE, RANASTHALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SRI B SUDHAKARA RAO, S/O ASIRAYYA, FORMER PROJECT

DIRECTOR,

DISTRICT

WATER

MANAGEMENT

AGENCY,

COLLECTORATE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AND PRESENTLY

WORKING AS DIRECTOR OF SERP (SOCIETY FOR ELIMINATION

OF RURAL POVERTY), 2ND FLOOR, NTR ADMINISTRATIVE

BLOCK, PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION (PNBS), VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT), PIN - 520001.

2. SRI B LOVARAJU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONERS WORKING

AS DISTRICT VIGILANCE OFFICER AND (FAC) AS PROJECT

DIRECTOR,

DISTRICT

WATER

MANAGEMENT

AGENCY,

COLLECTORATE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT - 532001.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of Order Dt. 22.11.2024 passed in W.P No.22502 of 2014 on the file of this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SRINIVAS AMBATI

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY)

The Court made the following:

CONTEMPT CASE No.564 OF 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.22502 of 2014, dated 22.11.2024, has been complied with and that the District Water Management Agency, MGNREGS, Srikakulam, has passed further orders on 03.02.2026. As such, no further orders are necessary in the present Contempt Case.

2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing further survives for consideration in the present Contempt Case.

3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 18.09.2026 KGM

CONTEMPT CASE No.564 of 2026 Date: 18.09.2026

KGM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead