Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2575/2026 of KOMMINENI KRISHNA Vs K. VIJAYA KRISHNAN, IAS on 17 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2575/2026 Between: 1. KOMMINENI KRISHNA, S/O LATE KRISHNA, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. EX-SERVICE MEN, D.NO.58-1 19/1,
APHC010365402026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3505]
FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2575/2026
Between:
1. KOMMINENI KRISHNA, S/O LATE KRISHNA, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC.
EX-SERVICE
MEN,
D.NO.58-1
19/1,
OLD
KARASA,
NAD,
VISAKHAPATNAM. -530009
...PETITIONER
AND
1. K VIJAYA KRISHNAN IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI
DISTRICT, ANAKAPALLI. - 531001
2. SMT
SHAUK
AYASHA,
REVENUE
DIVISIONAL
OFFICER,
ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. - 531001
3. SRI RATHNAM, TAHSILDAR, O/0 THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, PARAWADA, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. -531001
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the Respondents and punish them under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilful violation of orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.36964 of 2022, Dt.21.07.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V MAHESWAR REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. K M KRISHNA REDDY
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE No.2575 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the respondents that the order under Contempt has been complied with and proceedings dated 10.09.2026, has been issued to that effect. A copy of the said proceedings is placed before this Court. The submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. In the circumstances, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the Contempt Case and accordingly, the same is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
Date.18.09.2026 CVD