Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1856/2025 of GAYATHRI CONSTRUCTIONS Vs G SAI PRASAD on 17 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1856/2025 Between: 1. GAYATHRI CONSTRUCTIONS, MIG 2-45, NEAR SAI PUBLIC SCHOOL, APH COLONY, MACHILIPATNAM,
APHC010340102025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1856/2025
Between:
1. GAYATHRI CONSTRUCTIONS, MIG 2-45, NEAR SAI PUBLIC
SCHOOL,
APH
COLONY,
MACHILIPATNAM,
KRISHNA
DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SMT
KUMUDAWATHI SEETHA
...PETITIONER
AND
1. G SAI PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. SRI
PEEYUSH
KUMAR
IAS,
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
SECRETARIAT
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SRI G SAI PRASAD, COMMISSIONER, CADA AND SPECIAL
CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, WATER
RESOURCES
(CADA)
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. SRI
R
MOHAN
RAO,
SUPERINTENDENT
ENGINEER,
IRRIGATION CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. SRI B ANJANEYA PRASAD, (PRESENT) EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
6. SRI SARIPALLI SRINU, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
IRRIGATION AND C.A.D. DEPARTMENT, COWTHARAM SUB-
DIVISION, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience to the order dated 22-04-2025 passed in W.P.
No. 3540 of 2025 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. T S RAYALU
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 22.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.3540 of 2025.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents have complied with the orders passed by this Court and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt case is closed, accordingly. No costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.09.2026 rsd
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1856/2025
Date: 18.09.2026 rsd