CRLRC/2131/2009 of KANUMURI ESWARA RAJU ALIAS KASI , Vs KANUMURI KUMARI AND 3 OTHERS, on 17 September 2026

1. KANUMURI ESWARA RAJU ALIAS KASI ,, S/O. SRIRAMARAJU, R/O. ADDAM VILLAGE, ETCHIRALA P.S., KASIMKOTA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. KANUMURI KUMARI AND 3 OTHERS, W/O. ESWARA RAJU, R/O. 12- 09, BC.COLONY, AGANAMPUDI , GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM

2. K RAMYA, D/O. ESWARA RAJU, R/O. 12-09, BC.COLONY, AGANAMPUDI , GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM

3. K DIVYA, D/O. ESWARA RAJU, R/O. 12-09, BC.COLONY, AGANAMPUDI , GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 BEIN MINORS REP BY

4. STATE OF A P, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD.

...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case aggrived by the order M.C.No. 221/2007 dated 15.05.2009 passed by the Judge Addl. Family Court Visakhapatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 3002 OF 2009

SS,J Crl.R.C.No.2131 of 2009

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to order dated 15.5.2009 in M.C.NO. 221/2007 on the file of the Judge, Addl. Family Court, Visakhapatnam IA NO: 2 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 37679 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. P RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. P SARASWATHI

2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

3. LEGAL AID

SS,J Crl.R.C.No.2131 of 2009

The Court made the following Order:

The instant Criminal Revision has been preferred against an order dated 15.05.2009 in M.C.No.221 of 2007 passed by the learned Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam. The petitioner is husband of respondents. The respondents herein are the petitioners filed M.C.No.221 of 2007 under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. to get maintenance.

2. After hearing the parties, the learned Court below has ordered and allowed the petition, granting maintenance in favour of the 1st respondent (wife) to a tune of Rs.1500/- and Rs.1000/- each per month in favour of the children totaling to Rs.3500/-.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a coolie, who used to earn only Rs.70/- per day. Therefore, the maintenance amount is exorbitant for him. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that it has been pleaded before the learned Trial Court that the petitioner has six (06) acres of property.

4. Having heard the entire facts and circumstances and after perusing the impugned order passed by the learned Magistrate, it appears that the order of maintenance granting a total amount of Rs.3500/- as maintenance, that too for three (03) persons, at the present market value, the said amount is a very meager one, and therefore, it cannot be said to be exorbitant one.

SS,J Crl.R.C.No.2131 of 2009

5. Accordingly, I find no justification to entertain the petitioner. Thus, this Criminal Revision Case is hereby dismissed as devoid of merit. The petitioner is directed to pay on the maintenance as per the direction of the learned Magistrate. Arrears of maintenance shall be paid to the respondents within three (03) months by three (03) equal installments.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J

Date:18.09.2026 KPV

SS,J

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:2131 of 2009

18.09.2026

KPV