Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3627/2025 of SRI VISHNU SRIRAM CONSTRUCTIONS Vs PIYUSH KUMAR on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3627/2025 Between: 1. SRI VISHNU SRIRAM CONSTRUCTIONS, D.NO.4-1-735-1, 7TH STREET, ANJANEYANAGAR

APHC010633362025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3627/2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SRI VISHNU SRIRAM CONSTRUCTIONS, D.NO.4-1-735-1, 7TH STREET, ANJANEYANAGAR BADVEL, BADVEL MANDAL,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI V.DASARADHA RAMI REDDY, S/O. V RAMA MOHAN REDDY,

...PETITIONER AND

1. PIYUSH KUMAR, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.

2. SRI V V NARASIMHA REDDY, COMMISSIONER THE BADVEL MUNICIPALITY, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 3.

3. SRI CHINTAKUNTA SUMAN REDDY, THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BADVEL MUNICIPALITY,BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT

4. SRI PINNAM MAHESH, THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER BADVEL MUNICIPALITY,BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 4. 5

5. SRI D SREENIVASULU, . THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein for wilfully and deliberately violating the order passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No. 26523/2024, dated.22.07.2025 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. TRIPURAM RAVITEJA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA

2. KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI

The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been complied with.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 18.09.2026 RJS/GCD

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

C.C.NO:3627 of 2025

Dt: 18.09.2026

RJS/GCD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead