Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/2074/2026 of The Chairman and Managing Director Vs Sudha Oil and Chemical Industries Ltd on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2074 OF 2026 Between: 1. The Chairman and Managing Director, APEPDCL Seethamadhara, Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner AND 1. Sudha Oil and

APHC010278362026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. The Chairman and Managing Director, APEPDCL Seethamadhara, Visakhapatnam.

...Petitioner

AND

1. Sudha Oil and Chemical Industries Ltd, Represented by its Managing Director, Peddapuram.

...Respondent

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toggrieved by the orders dated 10-10-2025 in E.A. No. 51/2019 in E.P. No. 50/2018 in O.S. No. 152/1996 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Peddapuram, IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Please to condone Delay of 119 day in filling the civilRevision petition in E.A

No.51 of 2019 in E.P No.50 2018 in o.s No. 2018 in o.s 152 of 1996 Dt.10-10- 2025 on the file of the Principal Junior civil Judge Peddapuram in the interest of justice and pass

IA NO: 2 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay all further Proceedings in E.P NO.50 of 2018 in O.S NO. 152

of 1996 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Peddapuram,Pending disposal of the CRP and to Pass Counsel for the Petitioner: V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)

Counsel for the Respondent

The Court made the following order:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Mr. Y. Nagendra, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

2. Recording the said submission, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous.

3. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J

GVK

Dt. 18.09.2026

GVK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead