Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/17299/2002 of N.G.REDDY Vs THE SRI KALAHASTI COOP.TOWN BANK LTD. on 17 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No: 17299/2002 Between: 1. N.G.REDDY, - ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SRI KALAHASTI COOP TOWN BANK LTD, -

APHC010209452002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION No: 17299/2002

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. N.G.REDDY, -

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE SRI KALAHASTI COOP TOWN BANK LTD, -

...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 21711 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 306 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 24568 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Bank to pay all the retirement benefits such as gratuity, Provident Fund accumulations, encashment of earned and subsistence allowance for the period of suspension.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K S GOPALA KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent:

1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY

The Court made the following ORDER:

Sri P.V.Raghuram, learned counsel representing Sri K.S.Gopala Krishnan, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, submits that he will withdraw the writ petition, with a liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

Sri V.Sudhakar Redy, learned counsel for the respondents not raised any objection.

In view of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum.

With this observation, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.09.2026

PSK

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION No: 17299/2002

Date: 18.09.2026

W PSK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead