Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/4073/2025 of SURYA INFRASTRUCTURES KAKINADA Vs S SURESH KUMAR on 17 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4073/2025 Between: 1. SURYA INFRASTRUCTURES KAKINADA, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER AND CONTRACTOR ,YALLA SURYA
APHC010688352025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3457]
FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4073/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SURYA INFRASTRUCTURES KAKINADA, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER AND CONTRACTOR ,YALLA SURYA CHAKRAVARTHI S/O YALLAVENKATA RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/OYALLAVARISTREET, CINEMA ROAD, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DIST.
...PETITIONER AND
1. S SURESH KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN
AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATI.
2. SRI SHAN MOLHAN SAGILI, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR
KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA.
3. SRI N V V SATYANARAYANA, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS MUNICIPAL
COMMISSIONER, KAKINADAMUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
KAKINADA TOWN, KAKINADA DISTRICT.
4. SRI S MATSYA RAJU, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT
5. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STATE OF
ANDHRA PRADESH FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue summons under section 10 to 12, 15 and 16 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willfull violation of orders of this Hon'ble court made in WP No 30940 of 2024 dt 24/07/2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BOKKA SATYANARAYANA KAMLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations
2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI
3. The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been complied with.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 18.09.2026 RJS/GCD
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
C.C.NO:4073 of 2025
Dt: 18.09.2026
RJS/GCD