Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/446/2026 of M/s. Bhasaveswara Infratech Vs Sri.Peyush Kumar, on 17 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 446/2026 Between: 1. M/S. BHASAVESWARA INFRATECH, , HAVING ITS OFFICE AT D.NO.8/646/3, VAKKALAPET, ALMASPETA,
APHC010006782026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 446/2026
Between:
1. M/S. BHASAVESWARA INFRATECH, , HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
D.NO.8/646/3,
VAKKALAPET,
ALMASPETA,
KADAPA,
REPRESENTED
BY
ITS
MANAGING
PARTNER,
RAVURU
NAGENDRA PRASAD, S/O. RAVURU BALA NAGAIAH, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
OCC.
CONTRACTOR,
RESIDENT
OF
D.NO.8/644,
VAKKALAPETA,
ALMASPETA,
KADAPA,
Y.S.R
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI PEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI N MANOJ REDDY, COMMISSIONER, KADAPA MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the Respondents herein for violation of the orders, dated 05.12.2025 made in W.P.No.33898 of 2025
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. M DELHI BABU
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.446 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No. 33898 of 2025, dated 05.12.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 18.09.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.446 of 2026 Date: 18.09.2026
KGM