Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/568/2026 of M/S.Tangella Ramulu Vs Sri.N.V.V.Satyanarayana , on 17 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 568/2026 Between: 1. M/S.TANGELLA RAMULU, S/O. T.JAGGA RAO, AGE. 67 YEARS, D.NO.16-23-37/4B1,AYODHYA NAGAR, ROAD
APHC010060452026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 568/2026
Between:
1. M/S.TANGELLA RAMULU, S/O. T.JAGGA RAO, AGE. 67 YEARS, D.NO.16-23-37/4B1,AYODHYA
NAGAR,
ROAD
NO.3,KAKINADA,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI N V V SATYANARAYANA, COMMISSIONER, KAKINADA
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION , KAKINADA DISTRICT.533001
2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND
PLANNING
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522238
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt12.11.2025 of this Honble Court made in WP. No.31356/2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU NAGURU
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.568 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.31356 of 2025, dated 12.11.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 18.09.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.568 of 2026 Date: 18.09.2026
KGM