Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/4669/2024 of MUDUMURI VENKATA BHASKER RAJU Vs MADDURI DONTI REDDY on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE 17 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4669/2024 Between: 1. MUDUMURI VENKATA BHASKER RAJU, REP.BY ITS GPA HOLDER M.VENKATA RAMA RAJU, S/O. RAYAPARAJU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1 VAMSI KRISHNA NAGAR,

APHC010573702024

IN THE

THURSDAY, T

THE HONOURAB

CONT

Between:

1. MUDUMURI VENKAT

M.VENKATA RAMA

YEARS, R/O. D.NO

VAMSI KRISHNA N

DISTRICT.

2. R. SARALA,, W/O. VE

YEARS, R/O. H.NO.2

STREET, BHIMAVARA

1. MADDURI

DONTI

BHEEMAVARAM WE

2. K

RAMA

CHAND

COMMISSIONER, BH

2 IS IMPLEADED AS

IA NO-1/25 IN CC NO

Petition under Section

that in the circumstances s

be pleased to may be pl

punish them under provisio

disobedience of the orde

2024, by His Lordship Sri J

C.C.N

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPA

TEMPT CASE NO: 4669/2024

TA BHASKER RAJU, REP.BY ITS GPA

RAJU, S/O. RAYAPARAJU, AGED A

O.1-2-40, FLAT NO.304,'SATYA RE

NAGAR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST G

ENKATA NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED A

27-13-17, WARD NO.34, NEAR SAPOT

AM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETIT

AND

REDDY,

MUNICIPAL

COMMIS

EST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

RA

REDDY,

REP

BY

ITS

M

HEEMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DIS

PER COURT ORDER DATED 23.12.2

O-4669 OF 2024

...CONTE

ns 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 19

tated in the affidavit file herein the High leased to summon the Respondents ons of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for ers dated 02-04-2024 passed in W.P.N

Justice Ravi Cheemalapati and pass

RC,J

No.4669 of 2024

H

ATI

A HOLDER

ABOUT 68

SIDENCY,

GODAVARI

ABOUT 53

TA LODGE

TIONER(S)

SSIONER,

UNICIPAL

STRICT. R

2025, VIDE

MNOR(S):

971 praying

Court may

herein and

r their willful

No.2339 of

RC,J

C.C.No.4669 of 2024

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to implead the 2nd Respondent herein in above Contempt Case No.4669 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1.T N M RANGA RAO

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1.SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI SC For MUNICIPALITIES

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Ms. Sirisha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned counsel for petitioners, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt case, has duly been complied with and hence this contempt case may be closed.

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2026.

RR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead