WP/11971/2026 of SINGEETHAM SRINIVASA RAO Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 16 September 2026

APHC010231242026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

WRIT PETITION NO: 11971/2026

Between:

1. SINGEETHAM SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. PRAVEEN KUMAR AGED

ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE R/O. PLOT NO. 40, P

AND

T

COLONY,

OPP

RTA

OFFICE

TIRUMALGIRI,

SECUNDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE-500015.

2. SINGEETHAM PRAVEEN KUMAR,, S/O. VENKATESAM AGED

ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO. 40, P AND T

COLONY, OPP. RTA OFFICE, TIRUMALAGIRI, SECUNDERABAD

TELANGANA STATE-500015.

3. SMT. SINGEETHAM INDUMATHI, @ SMT. SINGEETHAM INDU

PRAVEEN W/O. SINGEETHAM PRAVEEN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT

64 YEARS, OCC RTD.ERNPLOYEE R/O. PLOT NO. 40, P AND T

COLONY, OPP. RTA OFFICE, TIRUMALAGIRI, SECUNDERABAD

TELANGANA STATE-500015.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, WOMEN CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-

522237.

2. THE A P WOMEN COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON

OFFICE AT FLAT NO.506, 4TH FLOOR, MGM CAPITAL, DR.YSR

AROGYA SRI COMPLEX, NH, CHINNAKAKANI, MANGALAGIRI,

GUNTUR DISTRICT-522503.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIJAYAWADA, BUCKINGHAMPETA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH, 520002

4. THE

COMMISSIONER

OF

POLICE,

VIJAYAWADA

POLICE

COMMISSIONERATE,

VENKATESWARA

RAO

STREET,

GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH, 520002.

5. SMT

SINGEETHAM

ANANTHA

VENKATA

KALYANI,

W/O.

SINGEETHAM SRINIVAS RAO, D/O. TELANAKULA ANANTHA

VENKATA NARASIMHAM, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC.

HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO. 9-75-15, BHIMANNAVARI STREET, NEHRU BOMMA CENTRE, KOTHAPETA, VIJAYAWADA(URBAN), VIJAYAWADA, NTR COMMISSIONERATE,PIN-520001.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropiate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 to 4 in interferring into the at the behest and influence of the Respondent No.5 and family disputes Pressurizing the petitioners to settle the Family issues with the 5th Respondent by making use of their good offices and their Positions and further also interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners harrasing the petitioners at the behest and infulence of and also Respondent No.5 duly quashing and setting aside the impugned notice bearing File No.475/APWC/2025-26, dated. 13-04-2026 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and to pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to interferre into the Family disputes in between the Petitioners and Respondent No.5 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to interferre into the

Family disputes in between the Petitioners and Respondent No.5 forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. SHAIK MEERAVALI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE

2. GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

WRIT PETITION No.11971 OF 2026