Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/21795/2026 of CHALLA SUKEERTHI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.21795 of 2026 Between: 1. CHALLA SUKEERTHI, W/O PULLA RAO, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O.

APHC010402592026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

WRIT PETITION No.21795 of 2026

Between:

1. CHALLA SUKEERTHI, W/O PULLA RAO, AGED ABOUT 33

YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO. 61-21-7, AYYAPPA

SWAMY ROAD, OPP SRKM SCHOOL, RAMALINGESWARA

NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE

STATE

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

THROUGH

THE

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT, OF WOMEN DEVELOPMENT

AND CHILD WELFARE, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA. N.T.R. DISTRICT-

520002.

3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN AND CHILD

DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (DW AND CDA) NEAR A.K

CONVENTION, CHALASANI NAGAR, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT-522101

4. PRAJWALA JMJ OPEN SHELTER FOR GIRLS, REP BY ITS IN- CHARGE/AUTHORIZED

OFFICER,

KRISHNA

LANKA,

VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT-520013.

5. CHALLA PULLA RAO, S/O. VITHAL RAO, AGED ABOUT 38

YEARS,

R/O.61-21-7,

RAMALINGESWARA

NAGAR,

VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R. DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order and direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 3 in entrusting custody and care of the minor

by name Ch.Bhagya Lakshmi to the 4TH Respondent control and custody at the behest of the unofficial respondent contrary to the law is wholly illegal, gross violation of articles 14 AND 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to 1 to 4 to hand over the minor by name Ch. Bhagya Lakshmi to the petitioner herein.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. GHANTASALA UDAYA BHASKAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

WRIT PETITION No.21795 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The present Writ Petition is filed, inter alia, questioning the action of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 in entrusting custody and care of the minor girl by name Ch.Bhagya Lakshmi to the respondent No.4 control and custody at the behest of the unofficial respondent with a consequential prayer to direct the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to hand over the minor girl by name Ch.Bhagya Lakshmi to the petitioner herein.

2. The petitioner herein is the mother of the minor girl. According to the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, the grandmother and maternal uncle of the minor girl performed the marriage of the minor girl with one Durga Rao. When the said fact was brought to the notice of respondent No.5, the minor child was placed at protect home. At the request of the petitioner’s counsel and the respondents’ counsel, this Court directed the respondent No.4 to produce the minor girl before this Court. Accordingly, the minor girl was produced before this Court and this Court has directed the Mediation Officer to conduct mediation. The minor girl deposed that if the minor girl is given custody to the petitioner, it will be endanger to the safety of the minor girl and stated that the minor girl is intended to stay and to continue her studies in the Rides Open Shelter for Girls, Nuziveedu.

3. Taking into consideration of the affidavit filed by the minor girl, this Court is not inclined to grant relief as prayed by the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.09.2026

siva

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

WRIT PETITION No.21795 of 2026

Date: 17.09.2026

siva

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead