Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/26572/2026 of VEMULA NAGESWARA RAO Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 16 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 26572 OF 2026 Between: 1. VEMULA NAGESWARA RAO, S/o Vemula Sekhar,

APHC010488592026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. VEMULA NAGESWARA RAO, S/o Vemula Sekhar, Aged about 37 years, Occupation Business R/o 3-185/C, Bhupalnagar, Near Nandanapalli Village, Gargeyapuram, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh 518452. ...Petitioner AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.

2. The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh.

4. The Station House Officer, Kurnool Town 3 Police Station, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondent police to produce the detenues ((i) Ediga Gopi Goud (Detenue No.1), S/o Ediga YeIla Goud, aged about 36 years, resident of H.No. 3-187/B, Bhupalnagar, Near Boru Bavi, Nandanapalli, Gargeyapuram, Kurnool, and his wife (10 Ediga Vani Sree @ Vanisri (Detenue No.2), W/o Ediga Gopi Goud, aged about 33 years, before this Hon'ble Court and to set them at liberty, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: V BABY RANI Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order:

ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)

Heard Sri M.S.P. Reddy, learned counsel, representing Smt. V. Baby Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri J. Krishna Praneeth, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition and wants to withdraw the same and it may be dismissed as withdrawn.

3. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J

___________________ ALAPATI GIRIDHAR,J

Dated: 17.09.2026 SRT

69

Dated: 17.09.2026 SRT

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead