Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2366/2026 of RESU RAMANA Vs MUKESH KUMAR MEENA on 16 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2366/2026 Between: 1. RESU RAMANA, S/O SAMBAYYA, AGE 43 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO C90,
APHC010302102026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2366/2026
Between:
1. RESU RAMANA, S/O SAMBAYYA, AGE 43 YEARS, OCC
CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO C90, GUNADALAPETA SARIKA VILLAGE
VIZIANAGARAM MANDAL VIZAYANAGARAM DISTRICT - A.P- 535004
...PETITIONER
AND
1. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT, LAND ACQUISITION, UNDER THE REVENUE
DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238. A.P
2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND
PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT - 522238. A.P
3. SMT
A
SURYA
KUMARI,
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
AT
VIZAYANAGARAM, A.P. VIZAYANAGARAM DISTRICT - 535003.
4. SRI P V V SURYA NARAYANA RAJU, REVENUE DIVISIONAL
OFFICER AT VIZAYANAGARAM, A.P VIZAYANAGARAM DISTRICT - 535003
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon, prosecute and punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for Willful, deliberate violation of the orders of this Hon’ble High Court dated 05.01.2026 in the Writ petition No.29262/2023 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. K M KRISHNA REDDY
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.2366 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with by the respondents.
Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.09.2026 KBN
Contempt Case No.2366 of 2026
17.09.2026 KBN