Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10168/2022 of PABOLU SURYANARAYANA Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 15 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 10168/2022 Between: 1. PABOLU SURYANARAYANA, S/O.PABOLU PANDURANGARAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-1-8,
APHC010157602022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 10168/2022
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PABOLU SURYANARAYANA, S/O.PABOLU PANDURANGARAO, AGED ABOUT
YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-1-8, POLUKONDA, POLUKONDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT -521 321.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (LAND ACQUISITION) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, CHILAKALAPUDI, MACHILIPATNAM.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NUZIVID, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the
High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents inaction of the respondents in considering the claim of the Petitioner for payment of compensation for acquisition of the residential plot of an extent of 266.66 Square yards in R.S.No.480/4 of Buddavaram Village, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna District under Rehabilitation and Resettlement Package for expansion of Gannavaram International Air Port as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article.14, 21 and Right to Property under Article.300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay compensation to the Petitioner on par with other beneficiaries forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for payment of compensation on par with other beneficiaries in the light of the Endorsement dt.28-01-2022 forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.10168 of 2022 O R DE R: Learned counsel for the Petitioner filed Letter dated 10.09.2026 seeking permission of the Court for withdrawal of the writ petition
2. Permission as sought for is accorded.
3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 16.09.2026 KLP