WP/13277/2026 of Devara Konda Suresh Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 15 September 2026

1. DEVARA KONDA SURESH, S/O.THAYANNA, R/O D.NO. 17-1-292-4, RV NAIDU COLONY, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 515001

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND MARKETING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI- 522237

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT - 515001

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU DIVISION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT- 515001

4. THE TAHSILDAR, ANANTHAPURAMU MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT -515001

5. THE ANANTHAPURAMU, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD., KAMALANAGAR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT - 515001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

6. THE ANANTHAPURAMU, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LTD., KAMALANAGAR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT - 515001 REPRESENTED BY ITS BUSINESS MANAGER.

7. NAKKA RAMALAKSHMAMMA, W/O.NAKKA SAMBASIVA, R/O.D.NO.8/137-A,

L B COLONY, BUKKARAYASAMUDRAM, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT- 515701

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the inaction of Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 in handing over vacant possession of the Temporary Shed situated in an extent of Ac.0.0214 cents in Survey Nos.164/3A and 164/4 at Gooty Road, Anantapuram Rural Village, Anantapuram District, A.P to the Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, besides being violative of Articles 14, 19(1 )(g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 herein to hand over vacant possession of the subject property to the Petitioner forthwith and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct Respondent No.5 and 6 to hand over vacant possession of the subject property to the Petitioner herein by initiating appropriate steps against Respondent No.7 in accordance with law and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. GP FOR AGRICULTURE

3. N RANGA REDDY

4. P NARASIMHULU

The Court made the following order:

The Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to respondents 5 and 6 to hand over possession of a temporary shed admeasuring 2 ½ cents in Survey No.164/3A and 164/4 at Gooty Road, Ananthapuram.

2. It is the specific case of the petitioner that the petitioner participated in the bid for letting out a temporary shed by the 6th respondent. The petitioner submitted that an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- was deposited towards earnest money and it is also submitted that the said property could not be hand over to the petitioner as the 7th respondent was under occupation of said property.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the 7th respondent had filed W.P.No.5709 of 2022, aggrieved by the action of the respondents therein not taking steps to dispossess her. The said Writ Petition is disposed of vide Order dated 18.06.2026, whereby the respondents therein were directed to follow due procedure of law for taking any action against the petitioner.

4. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 5 and 6 has placed on record the instructions received. It is stated in the instructions that an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- was deposited by the petitioner towards advance for temporary shed, which was to be allotted in future. It is also stated no public auction was conducted and that the Writ Petition filed by the 7th respondent was disposed of, directing the respondent therein to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

5. The subject property is under dispute and the claim of the property would have to be decided by the Civil Court. It is also stated that an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- was not paid towards the bid auction amount and it was only a deposit towards allotment in future. The learned counsel for respondents 5 and 6 also submitted that the possession of the property could not be handed over to the petitioner or anybody, as the property is under dispute. As such, there is no question of handing over the disputed property in favour of the petitioner when the dispute is pending before the competent Court.

6. On these considerations, the Writ Petition is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to claim the amount deposited with the 6th respondent.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 16.09.2026 RJS/GCD

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 13277/2026

Dt: 16.09.2026

RJS/GCD