Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/17753/2025 of JAGATHA VENKATA GANGADHAR Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 15 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 16 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No: Between: 1. JAGATHA VENKATA GANGADHAR, AGE.46 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/o.FLAT No.503, LOTUS

APHC010350242025

IN THE H

(

WEDNESDAY,

THE HON’BLE

THE HON’B

WRIT

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. JAGATHA VENKA OCC. BUSINESS, APARTMENT, RD TELANGANA 500034

1. THE STATE OF AN SECRETARY, FINA VELAGAPUDI, AMAR

2. THE CHIEF COMM DOOR NO. 12-468-4 KUNCHANAPALLY, 522501

3. THE ASSISTANCE C 10-355, 3RD FLO KAKINADA, ANDHRA

4. SIDHVI INFRASTRU REGD. OFFICE AT 1 BEGUMPET, HYDER

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT E SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR PETITION No: 17753 of 2025 ATA GANGADHAR, AGE.46 R/o.FLAT No.503, LOTUS ESP NUMBER 1, BANJARA HILLS, HYD ...PE AND NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P ANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECR RAVATI - 522 238 ISSIONER ST, COMMERCIAL DEPA 4, ADJACENT TO NH-16, SERVIC GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PR OMMISSIONER ST, KAKINADA CIRCL OR,

CT COMPLEX, RAMANAY A PRADESH - 533005 UCTURE PROJECTS LIMITED, HAV 1-11-113/3, P-2, SAI SIKHARA APAR RABAD-, TELANGANA - 500016 ...RESPON

YEARS, PLENDITO DERABAD, TITIONER PRINCIPAL RETARIAT, ARTMENT CE ROAD, RADESH - LE, D.NO. YYAPETA, VING ITS RTMENTS, NDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt.AVANIJA INUGANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Court made the following order : (Per NJS, J)

As seen from the relief sought for, it would appear that the writ petition is not maintainable. However, it is stated by Mr.D.Siddi Srikar, learned counsel representing Smt.Avanija Inuganti that the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 16.09.2026 BLV

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

W.P.No.17753 of 2025 Dt: 16.09.2026

BLV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead