Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3498/2025 of M/S.Bhavani Constructions Vs Sri N.V.V Satyanarayana on 15 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3498/2025 Between: 1. M/S.BHAVANI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP.BY.ITS MANAGING PARTNER,NAGAM KONDALA RAO S/O.N.CHINNA

APHC010613862025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3457]

WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3498/2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. M/S.BHAVANI CONSTRUCTIONS, REP.BY.ITS MANAGING PARTNER,NAGAM KONDALA RAO S/O.N.CHINNA VEERRAJU , AGE 55 YEARS, R/O.21-01-5/3,PYDA VARI STREET SALI PETA , KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

...PETITIONER AND

1. SRI N V V SATYANARAYANA, COMMISSIONER, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT.R 1 CAUSE TITLE AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 27.02.2026, VIDE IA NO-1/2025 IN CC NO 3498 OF 2025

2. SRI S MASTYARAJU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT.

3. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 16.07.2025 of this Honble Court made in WP. No.5611/2025 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Amend the Cause Title in the present Contempt case by Deleting the Respondent No. 1. Sri Sachidandha varma. Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada District and Amend Respondent 1 as Sri N V V Satyanarayana, Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada in the above C.C.No.3498 of 2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations

The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been complied with.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 16.09.2026 RJS/GCD

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3498/2025

Dt: 16.09.2026

RJS/GCD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead