Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/17178/2026 of VEERADHI DEEPU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 15 September 2026
APHC010320762026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17178/2026 Between: 1. VEERADHI DEEPU, S/O V. SIVARUDRAPPA SIVANNA,
HN, J
W.P.No.17178_2026
APHC010320762026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 17178/2026
Between:
1. VEERADHI DEEPU, S/O V. SIVARUDRAPPA SIVANNA, AGED
ABOUT 35 YEARS,OCC AGRICULTURE R/O 6-37/A, BAIRAJU
VEEDI, BAIREDDIPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517415
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
SCHOOL
EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.522238
2. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
CHITTOOR,
CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.517001
3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517001
4. KASTURIBA GANDHI BALIKA VIDYANIKETHAN, REP. BY ITS
PRINCIPAL, V. KOTA, KAMMANAPALLE VILLAGE, BAIREDDIPALLI
MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517415
5. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, BAIREDDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517415
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No,4 in constructing the boundary wall through the land belong
HN, J
W.P.No.17178_2026
to the petitioner in an extant of Ac. 1.11 Cents in Sy.No.360/3 and Ac.0.38
Cents in Sy.No.360/4 of Kammanapalle Village, Baireddipalli Mandal, Chittoor District, without putting petitioner on notice or following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and colorable exercise of power, voilative of Principals of Natural Justice apart from being voilative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19 and 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondent No.4 to remove the boundary wall by restoring access to the land belong to the petitioner in an extant of Ac.1.11 Cents in Sy.No.360/3 and Ac.0.38 Cents in Sy.No.360/4
of Kammanapalle Village, Baireddipalli Mandal, Chittoor District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent’s No.3 & 4 to consider the representations, dated 15.06.2026 and 16.06.2026.submitted by me and take immediate necessary steps in pursuance of the same pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S PARINEETA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. RAGHU BABU KALAMATA SC For Samagra Siksha
2. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
3. GP FOR REVENUE
HN, J
W.P.No.17178_2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The petitioner is the title holder of land admeasuring an extent of Ac.1.11 cents in Sy.No.360/3 and Ac.0.38 cents in Sy.No.360/4 of Kammanapalle Village, Baireddipalli Mandal, Chittoor District .
2. It is submitted that the petitioner was also issued a Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deeds for the said property. As the petitioner is residing in Bangalore, she could not personally oversee the property, which was gifted to the petitioner vide a registered Gift Deed in the year 2024. As the property was vacant, respondent No.4 constructed a compound wall engulfing the petitioner’s property. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a representation seeking the respondent authorities to conduct a survey of her property and demarcate the same. A representation was also submitted to the District Educational Officer seeking removal of the boundary wall constructed by the school authorities.
3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education, Sri Raghu Babu Kalamata, learned Standing Counsel for Samagra Siksha and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.
3. In view of the above submissions, the present writ petition is disposed off at the admission stage with the following directions:
(i) Respondent No.5 shall conduct the survey after issuing notice to respondent Nos.3 and 4 and the petitioner as well, and shall demarcate the
HN, J
W.P.No.17178_2026 extent of the petitioner’s property.
(ii) In the event respondent No.5, upon conducting the survey and submitting the survey report, finds that any portion of the petitioner’s property has been encroached upon by respondent No.4 by constructing a compound wall the respondent No.2 shall issue appropriate directions to respondent No.4 to remove the said compound wall and shall ensure that respondent No.4 does not interfere with or trespass upon the petitioner’s private property except in accordance with due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:16.09.2026 NKA
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
HN, J
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 17178 of 2026 Date: 16.09.2026
NKA